Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 26

1.

Diagnostic testing and the illusory reassurance of normal results: comment on "Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease".

Kroenke K.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):416-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11. No abstract available.

PMID:
23440265
2.

Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rolfe A, Burton C.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):407-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2762.

PMID:
23440131
3.

Intestinal biopsy is not always required to diagnose celiac disease: a retrospective analysis of combined antibody tests.

Bürgin-Wolff A, Mauro B, Faruk H.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 23;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-19.

4.

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (from the Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study).

Gueret P, Deux JF, Bonello L, Sarran A, Tron C, Christiaens L, Dacher JN, Bertrand D, Leborgne L, Renard C, Caussin C, Cluzel P, Helft G, Crochet D, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, Chabbert V, Ferrari E, Gilard M, Willoteaux S, Furber A, Barone-Rochette G, Jankowski A, Douek P, Mousseaux E, Sirol M, Niarra R, Chatellier G, Laissy JP.

Am J Cardiol. 2013 Feb 15;111(4):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.029. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

PMID:
23261002
5.

Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, Part 3: everyday probabilities: diagnostic tests with binary results.

Shin JJ, Stinnett S, Page J, Randolph GW.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;147(2):185-92. doi: 10.1177/0194599812447750. Epub 2012 May 15.

PMID:
22588733
6.

Managing the breast in patients who test positive for hereditary breast cancer.

Euhus D.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1738-44. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2258-x. Epub 2012 Mar 7. Review.

PMID:
22395981
7.

European and American suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism populations: comparison and analysis.

Penaloza A, Kline J, Verschuren F, Courtney DM, Zech F, Derrien B, Vielle B, Armand-Perroux A, Thys F, Roy PM.

J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Mar;10(3):375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04631.x.

PMID:
22251951
8.

Routine use of coronary computed tomography as initial diagnostic test for angina pectoris.

Cheneau E, Vahdat B, Bernard L, Molon A, Panagides D.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jan;104(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.11.007. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

9.

Cascade effects of laboratory testing are found to be rare in low disease probability situations: prospective cohort study.

Houben PH, van der Weijden T, Winkens RA, Grol RP.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

PMID:
19880283
10.

D-dimer testing in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and impaired renal function.

Karami-Djurabi R, Klok FA, Kooiman J, Velthuis SI, Nijkeuter M, Huisman MV.

Am J Med. 2009 Nov;122(11):1050-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.032. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

PMID:
19698934
11.

Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.

Replogle WH, Johnson WD, Hoover KW.

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

PMID:
19413584
12.

Computed tomography coronary angiography vs. stress ECG in patients with stable angina.

Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Palumbo A, Maffei E, Martini C, Seitun S, Coppolino F, Belgrano M, Malagò R, Aldrovandi A, Mollet N, Weustink A, Cova M, Midiri M.

Radiol Med. 2009 Jun;114(4):513-23. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0388-4. Epub 2009 Apr 13. English, Italian.

PMID:
19367464
13.

Diagnosis: making the best use of medical data.

Ebell MH.

Am Fam Physician. 2009 Mar 15;79(6):478-80.

14.

A prospective evaluation of endoscopic markers for identifying celiac disease in patients with high and low probability of having the disease.

Reyes H, Niveloni S, Moreno ML, Vázquez H, Jer HH, Argonz J, Sugai E, Mazure R, Smecuol E, Crivelli A, La Motta G, Caniggia ME, Gómez JC, Chopita N, Kogan Z, Cabanne A, Mauriño E, Bai JC.

Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2008 Sep;38(3):178-86.

PMID:
18979897
15.

Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.

Bianchi MT, Alexander BM, Cash SS.

Med Decis Making. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):116-24. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323620. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

PMID:
18812583
16.

When is diagnostic testing inappropriate or irrational? Acceptable regret approach.

Hozo I, Djulbegovic B.

Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):540-53. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315249. Epub 2008 May 13.

PMID:
18480041
17.

Selective pretreatment diagnostic imaging for detecting remote metastases in patients with endometrial cancer.

Heyer H, Ohlinger R, Arndt D, Belau A, Nehmzow M, Hosten N, Köhler G.

Onkologie. 2006 Mar;29(3):85-9. Epub 2006 Mar 3.

PMID:
16514268
18.

Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.

Paulo S, Mendes S, Vizinho R, Carneiro AV.

Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Sep;23(9):1187-98. English, Portuguese.

19.

Understanding and using diagnostic tests.

Moyer VA, Kennedy KA.

Clin Perinatol. 2003 Jun;30(2):189-204. Review.

PMID:
12875350
20.

The utility of diagnostic tests in irritable bowel syndrome patients: a systematic review.

Cash BD, Schoenfeld P, Chey WD.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;97(11):2812-9. Review.

PMID:
12425553
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk