Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 287

1.

Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.

Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfield L, Wallis M, Bartlett JM, Brookes C, Roberts T, Pirrie S, Gaunt C, Young J, Billingham L, Dodwell D, Hanby A, Pinder SE, Evans A, Reed M, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Wilcox M, Fairbrother P, Bowden S, Rea D.

Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

PMID:
26296293
2.
3.

Swiss Medical Board Mammography screening predictions for Switzerland: importance of time-periods.

de Koning HJ, Heijnsdijk EA.

J Med Screen. 2015 Dec;22(4):201-6. doi: 10.1177/0969141315586639. Epub 2015 May 27.

PMID:
26018779
4.

Values in breast cancer screening: an empirical study with Australian experts.

Parker L, Rychetnik L, Carter S.

BMJ Open. 2015 May 20;5(5):e006333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006333.

5.

Screening Mammography in a Public Hospital Serving Predominantly African-American Women: A Stage-Survival-Cost Model.

Farley C, Friedman D, Habtes I, Raskind-Hood C, Adams EK, Becker ER, D'Orsi C, Gundry K, Birdsong G, Gabram-Mendola S.

Womens Health Issues. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

PMID:
25910513
6.

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.

Sankatsing VD, Heijnsdijk EA, van Luijt PA, van Ravesteyn NT, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;137(8):1990-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29572. Epub 2015 May 8.

PMID:
25895135
7.

Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening policies using simulation.

Gocgun Y, Banjevic D, Taghipour S, Montgomery N, Harvey BJ, Jardine AK, Miller AB.

Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

PMID:
25866350
8.

Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Davis TC, Arnold CL, Bennett CL, Wolf MS, Liu D, Rademaker A.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):291-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4967. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

9.

Women aged 75 years and older benefit from mammography.

Printz C.

Cancer. 2015 Jan 15;121(2):165. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29219. No abstract available.

10.

Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.

Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Lee CI, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ, Kerlikowske K, Lehman CD, Tosteson AN.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):157-66. doi: 10.7326/M14-0692.

11.

Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.

Manchanda R, Legood R, Burnell M, McGuire A, Raikou M, Loggenberg K, Wardle J, Sanderson S, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju380. Print 2015 Jan.

12.

[Cost-effectiveness of an organized breast cancer screening program in Southern Brazil].

Ribeiro RA, Caleffi M, Polanczyk CA.

Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Nov;29 Suppl 1:S131-45. Portuguese.

13.

Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.

Lee CI, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Sprague BL, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Stout NK, Jarvik JG, Ramsey SD, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):772-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141237. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

14.
15.
16.

Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.

Pataky R, Ismail Z, Coldman AJ, Elwood M, Gelmon K, Hedden L, Hislop G, Kan L, McCoy B, Olivotto IA, Peacock S.

J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141314549758. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

PMID:
25186116
17.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk.

Ahern CH, Shih YC, Dong W, Parmigiani G, Shen Y.

Br J Cancer. 2014 Oct 14;111(8):1542-51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.458. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

18.

Evolution of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population: clinical and economic implications.

Killelea BK, Long JB, Chagpar AB, Ma X, Wang R, Ross JS, Gross CP.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 16;106(8). pii: dju159. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju159. Print 2014 Aug.

19.

Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program.

Fayanju OM, Kraenzle S, Drake BF, Oka M, Goodman MS.

Am J Surg. 2014 Sep;208(3):425-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 May 4.

20.

Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.

Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk