My NCBI | Sign In
Search: cochlear implants[majr] AND english[la] AND humans[mh] AND (jsubsetk[text] OR review[pt] OR guideline[pt] OR clinical trial[pt] OR systematic[sb]) NOT (letter[pt] OR editorial[pt] OR case reports[pt]) AND "last 1 Year"[edat]
RSS Settings
  • Search: cochlear implants[majr] AND english[la] AND humans[mh] AND (js...

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 17

    1.

    Do Chinese speakers need a specialized cochlear implant system?

    Tong MC, Lee KY.

    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71(4):184-6. Epub 2009 Aug 26. Review.PMID: 19707034 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    Bilateral sequential cochlear implantation in the congenitally deaf child: evidence to support the concept of a 'critical age' after which the second ear is less likely to provide an adequate level of speech perception on its own.

    Graham J, Vickers D, Eyles J, Brinton J, Al Malky G, Aleksy W, Martin J, Henderson L, Mawman D, Robinson P, Midgley E, Hanvey K, Twomey T, Johnson S, Vanat Z, Broxholme C, McAnallen C, Allen A, Bray M.

    Cochlear Implants Int. 2009 Sep;10(3):119-41.PMID: 19593746 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    The economics of cochlear implant management in France: a multicentre analysis.

    Molinier L, Bocquet H, Bongard V, Fraysse B.

    Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Jul;10(3):347-55. Epub 2009 May 28.PMID: 19475439 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.

    Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Nie K, Won JH, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein J.

    Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):411-8.PMID: 19474735 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

    Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C.

    Trends Amplif. 2009 Jun;13(2):124-38. Review.PMID: 19447766 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of using amplification in conjunction with cochlear implantation.

    Olson AD, Shinn JB.

    J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Oct;19(9):657-71; quiz 735. Review.PMID: 19418706 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.

    Roditi RE, Poissant SF, Bero EM, Lee DJ.

    Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jun;30(4):449-54.PMID: 19415041 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results.

    Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ.

    Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:32-8. Epub 2009 Apr 22.PMID: 19390173 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.

    Lenarz T, Stöver T, Buechner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Patrick J, Pesch J.

    Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:22-31. Epub 2009 Apr 22.PMID: 19390172 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Impact of low-frequency hearing.

    Büchner A, Schüssler M, Battmer RD, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T.

    Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:8-13. Epub 2009 Apr 22.PMID: 19390170 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    A review of device failure in more than 23 years of clinical experience of a cochlear implant program with more than 3,400 implantees.

    Battmer RD, Linz B, Lenarz T.

    Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jun;30(4):455-63.PMID: 19373120 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems.

    Wolfe J, Schafer EC.

    J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Sep;19(8):585-94.PMID: 19323350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Psychometric validity of the Cochlear Implant Function Index (CIFI): a quality of life assessment tool for adult cochlear implant users.

    Coelho DH, Hammerschlag PE, Bat-Chava Y, Kohan D.

    Cochlear Implants Int. 2009 Jun;10(2):70-83.PMID: 19165814 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    The case for a generic implant processor.

    Strydis C, Gaydadjiev GN.

    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:3186-91. Review.PMID: 19163384 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results.

    Gstoettner W, Helbig S, Settevendemie C, Baumann U, Wagenblast J, Arnoldner C.

    Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Apr;129(4):372-9.PMID: 19140036 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO + and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO + cochlear implant systems in Finnish-speaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners?

    Välimaa TT, Löppönen HJ.

    Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Sep;128(9):984-91.PMID: 19086195 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation.

    Gstoettner WK, van de Heyning P, O'Connor AF, Morera C, Sainz M, Vermeire K, Mcdonald S, Cavallé L, Helbig S, Valdecasas JG, Anderson I, Adunka OF.

    Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Sep;128(9):968-75.PMID: 19086194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Search details

    » See more...

    Recent activity