Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2018 1
2019 3
2020 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

6 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Clinical Adverse Events and Device Failures Reported for the Captivator and Duette Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) Systems: A MAUDE Database Analysis.
Hagenstein LD, Dubrouskaya K, Ramai D, Adler DG. Hagenstein LD, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun 01;57(5):490-493. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001704. Epub 2022 Apr 14. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 35470284
Two systems used for EMR of upper gastrointestinal lesions are the Duette EMR kit and the Captivator EMR kit. The aim of this study is to analyze the reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) data …
Two systems used for EMR of upper gastrointestinal lesions are the Duette EMR kit and the Captivator EMR kit. The aim of this study i …
Comparison of two multiband mucosectomy devices for endoscopic resection of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia.
Alzoubaidi D, Graham D, Bassett P, Magee C, Everson M, Banks M, Novelli M, Jansen M, Lovat LB, Haidry R. Alzoubaidi D, et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3665-3672. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06655-0. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30671663 Free PMC article.
RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients were analysed (18M + 2F; mean age 74) in the Duette group and 20 (17M + 3F; mean age 72) in the Captivator group. A total of 58 specimens were resected in the Duette and 63 in the Captivator group. ...CONCLUSIONS: These two MBM d …
RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients were analysed (18M + 2F; mean age 74) in the Duette group and 20 (17M + 3F; mean age 72) in the Capt
Results of a two-phased clinical study evaluating a new multiband mucosectomy device for early Barrett's neoplasia: a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial and a pilot therapeutic pilot study.
Belghazi K, Schölvinck DW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Weusten BL, Meijer SL, Bergman JJ, Pouw RE. Belghazi K, et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2864-2872. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6582-5. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30456511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Non-inferiority of the max diameter of the Captivator specimens could not be demonstrated (median difference 1 mm, 95% CI - 3.26 to + 5.26). ...In the first patients, EMR using the Captivator was feasible, resulting in successful resection without acute adverse even …
Non-inferiority of the max diameter of the Captivator specimens could not be demonstrated (median difference 1 mm, 95% CI - 3.26 to + …
Multi-band mucosectomy for neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices.
Spadaccini M, Bhandari P, Maselli R, Spaggiari P, Alkandari AA, Varytimiadis L, Semeraro R, Di Leo M, Galtieri PA, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, D'Amico F, Attardo S, Brambilla T, Sharma P, Hassan C, Repici A. Spadaccini M, et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3845-3852. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07150-w. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31586245
No studies have yet compared the efficacy and safety of the MBM devices commercially available: Duette (CookMedical) and Captivator (BostonScientific). Our aim is to compare the two devices. ...R0 resection was achieved in 96.7% versus 96.3% (p = ns) and LR were recorded i …
No studies have yet compared the efficacy and safety of the MBM devices commercially available: Duette (CookMedical) and Captivator ( …
Factors determining the resection ability of snares in cold snare polypectomy: Construction of an ex vivo model for accurately evaluating resection ability.
Hirose R, Yoshida T, Yoshida N, Yamauchi K, Miyazaki H, Watanabe N, Bandou R, Inoue K, Ikegaya H, Nakaya T, Itoh Y. Hirose R, et al. Dig Endosc. 2024 May;36(5):573-581. doi: 10.1111/den.14676. Epub 2023 Sep 25. Dig Endosc. 2024. PMID: 37682639
RESULTS: The force required to resect using SnareMaster Plus, Micro-Tech Cold Snare, Captivator Cold, Exacto Cold Snare, or Captivator II was 13.6 1.0, 12.5 1.2, 7.4 1.2, 6.5 1.0, and 28.7 3.7 N, respectively. All DSs had significantly lower FRR than the conventiona …
RESULTS: The force required to resect using SnareMaster Plus, Micro-Tech Cold Snare, Captivator Cold, Exacto Cold Snare, or Captiv