Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):475-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.2110. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

ProsCan for Couples: a feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design.

Author information

  • 1Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. suzanne.chambers@griffith.edu.au

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The present study assessed the feasibility of delivering peer support for couples coping with prostate cancer within a trial design.

METHODS/DESIGN:

Ten peer volunteers completed training in research protocols and delivering tele-based couples support to men with prostate cancer and their partners. Twenty couples received an eight session intervention and were assessed before surgery and 3 and 6 months subsequently for adjustment outcomes. A focus group investigated the peers' experiences.

RESULTS:

Peers were motivated by altruism, a belief in research, and reported personal growth. The research protocol at times conflicted with lay models of helping, and the focus on sexuality and couples was challenging. Distress decreased over time but more so for partners; unmet sexuality needs did not improve.

CONCLUSION:

Peer support appears promising as a model to support couples facing prostate cancer.

Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PMID:
22144087
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk