Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 55

1.

Age-related differences in the neural correlates of trial-to-trial variations of reaction time.

Adleman NE, Chen G, Reynolds RC, Frackman A, Razdan V, Weissman DH, Pine DS, Leibenluft E.

Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 12.

2.

Dynamic filtering improves attentional state prediction with fNIRS.

Harrivel AR, Weissman DH, Noll DC, Huppert T, Peltier SJ.

Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Feb 23;7(3):979-1002. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.000979. eCollection 2016 Mar 1.

3.

Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.

Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Kirwan CB, Weissman DH.

Psychophysiology. 2016 Jun;53(6):814-22. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12625. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

PMID:
26854028
4.

Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.

Weissman DH, Hawks ZW, Egner T.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(4):566-83. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000182. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

PMID:
26389630
5.

The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.

Weissman DH, Colter K, Drake B, Morgan C.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Oct;161:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

PMID:
26343331
6.

Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?

Schmidt JR, Weissman DH.

Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):590-607. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0681-x. Epub 2015 Jun 21.

PMID:
26093801
7.

Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.

Schmidt JR, Weissman DH.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jul;159:61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

PMID:
26036421
8.

The congruency sequence effect emerges when the distracter precedes the target.

Weissman DH, Egner T, Hawks Z, Link J.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

PMID:
25616120
9.

Removing the influence of feature repetitions on the congruency sequence effect: why regressing out confounds from a nested design will often fall short.

Schmidt JR, De Schryver M, Weissman DH.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Dec;40(6):2392-402. doi: 10.1037/a0038073.

PMID:
25419672
10.

Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.

Weissman DH, Jiang J, Egner T.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2022-37. doi: 10.1037/a0037454. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

PMID:
25089574
11.

Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.

Schmidt JR, Weissman DH.

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102337. eCollection 2014.

12.

A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Moore KS, Weissman DH.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 7;9(2):e88313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088313. eCollection 2014.

13.

Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS.

Harrivel AR, Weissman DH, Noll DC, Peltier SJ.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 13;7:861. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00861. eCollection 2013.

14.

Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict.

Weissman DH, Carp J.

Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 4;4:587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00587. eCollection 2013.

15.

The congruency effect in the posterior medial frontal cortex is more consistent with time on task than with response conflict.

Weissman DH, Carp J.

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e62405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062405. Print 2013.

16.

Neural congruency effects in the multi-source interference task vanish in healthy youth after controlling for conditional differences in mean RT.

Kim K, Carp J, Fitzgerald KD, Taylor SF, Weissman DH.

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e60710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060710. Print 2013.

17.

Trial-by-Trial Adjustments of Cognitive Control Following Errors and Response Conflict are Altered in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

Liu Y, Gehring WJ, Weissman DH, Taylor SF, Fitzgerald KD.

Front Psychiatry. 2012 May 11;3:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00041. eCollection 2012.

18.
19.

Removing the effect of response time on brain activity reveals developmental differences in conflict processing in the posterior medial prefrontal cortex.

Carp J, Fitzgerald KD, Taylor SF, Weissman DH.

Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.064. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk