Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Jul 8;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-16.

The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling.

Author information

  • 1Americans For Medical Advancement, 2251 Refugio Rd, Goleta, CA 93117, USA. drraygreek@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The requirement that animals be used in research and testing in order to protect humans was formalized in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent national and international laws, codes, and declarations.

DISCUSSION:

We review the history of these requirements and contrast what was known via science about animal models then with what is known now. We further analyze the predictive value of animal models when used as test subjects for human response to drugs and disease. We explore the use of animals for models in toxicity testing as an example of the problem with using animal models.

SUMMARY:

We conclude that the requirements for animal testing found in the Nuremberg Code were based on scientifically outdated principles, compromised by people with a vested interest in animal experimentation, serve no useful function, increase the cost of drug development, and prevent otherwise safe and efficacious drugs and therapies from being implemented.

PMID:
22769234
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3532312
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk