Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.

Kaambwa B, Lancsar E, McCaffrey N, Chen G, Gill L, Cameron ID, Crotty M, Ratcliffe J.

Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun 30;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26210656
2.

Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.

Wortley S, Tong A, Lancsar E, Salkeld G, Howard K.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 14;15:52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0.

3.

Cognitive overload? An exploration of the potential impact of cognitive functioning in discrete choice experiments with older people in health care.

Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Lancsar E, Miller M, Crotty M.

Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

PMID:
25128060
4.

Preferences for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a best-best discrete choice experiment.

Ghijben P, Lancsar E, Zavarsek S.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Nov;32(11):1115-27. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0.

PMID:
25027944
5.

Understanding clinicians' decisions to offer intravenous thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.

De Brún A, Flynn D, Joyce K, Ternent L, Price C, Rodgers H, Ford GA, Lancsar E, Rudd M, Thomson RG.

BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 9;4(7):e005612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005612.

6.

A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care-study protocol.

Ratcliffe J, Lancsar E, Luszcz M, Crotty M, Gray L, Paterson J, Cameron ID.

BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 25;4(6):e005788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788.

7.

Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments.

Lancsar E, Swait J.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Oct;32(10):951-65. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0181-7.

PMID:
24920196
8.

A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Whitty JA, Lancsar E, Rixon K, Golenko X, Ratcliffe J.

Patient. 2014;7(4):365-86. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2. Review.

PMID:
24872225
9.

How important is health status in defining quality of life for older people? An exploratory study of the views of older South Australians.

Milte CM, Walker R, Luszcz MA, Lancsar E, Kaambwa B, Ratcliffe J.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0068-3.

PMID:
24254996
10.

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, Bresnahan BW, Kanninen B, Bridges JF.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.

PMID:
23337210
11.

Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application.

Lancsar E, Louviere J, Donaldson C, Currie G, Burgess L.

Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;76(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

PMID:
23159304
12.

Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE.

Baker R, Chilton S, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Mason H, Metcalf H, Pennington M, Wildman J.

Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Oct;6(4):435-47. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000181. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

PMID:
21854688
13.

Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments.

Lancsar E, Wildman J, Donaldson C, Ryan M, Baker R.

J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):466-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

PMID:
21310500
14.

The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise?

Donaldson C, Baker R, Mason H, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Wildman J, Bateman I, Loomes G, Robinson A, Sugden R, Prades JL, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 11;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-8.

15.

Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project.

Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, Mason H, Odejar M, Pinto Prades JL, Robinson A, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R, Sugden R, Wildman J; SVQ Research Team.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(27):1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta14270.

16.

Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women's views on alternative packages of care.

Deverill M, Lancsar E, Snaith VB, Robson SC.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jul;151(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.015. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

PMID:
20456855
17.

Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.

Louviere JJ, Lancsar E.

Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Oct;4(Pt 4):527-46. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990193.

PMID:
19715635
18.

Sources of variation in the costs of health care for asthma patients in Australia.

Kenny P, Hall J, King M, Lancsar E.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jul;14(3):133-40. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008078.

PMID:
19541871
19.

Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Lancsar E, Louviere J.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77.

PMID:
18620460
20.

Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments.

Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T.

Soc Sci Med. 2007 Apr;64(8):1738-53. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

PMID:
17257725
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk