Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 31

1.

Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent.

Gu Y, Lancsar E, Ghijben P, Butler JR, Donaldson C.

Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;146:41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Review.

PMID:
26498059
2.

An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people.

Kaambwa B, Gill L, McCaffrey N, Lancsar E, Cameron ID, Crotty M, Gray L, Ratcliffe J.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 30;13:164. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0357-7.

3.

Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.

Kaambwa B, Lancsar E, McCaffrey N, Chen G, Gill L, Cameron ID, Crotty M, Ratcliffe J.

Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

PMID:
26210656
4.

Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.

Wortley S, Tong A, Lancsar E, Salkeld G, Howard K.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 14;15:52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0.

5.

Cognitive overload? An exploration of the potential impact of cognitive functioning in discrete choice experiments with older people in health care.

Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Lancsar E, Miller M, Crotty M.

Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

PMID:
25128060
6.

Preferences for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a best-best discrete choice experiment.

Ghijben P, Lancsar E, Zavarsek S.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Nov;32(11):1115-27. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0.

PMID:
25027944
7.

Understanding clinicians' decisions to offer intravenous thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.

De Brún A, Flynn D, Joyce K, Ternent L, Price C, Rodgers H, Ford GA, Lancsar E, Rudd M, Thomson RG.

BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 9;4(7):e005612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005612.

8.

A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care-study protocol.

Ratcliffe J, Lancsar E, Luszcz M, Crotty M, Gray L, Paterson J, Cameron ID.

BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 25;4(6):e005788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788.

9.

Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments.

Lancsar E, Swait J.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Oct;32(10):951-65. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0181-7. Review.

PMID:
24920196
10.

A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Whitty JA, Lancsar E, Rixon K, Golenko X, Ratcliffe J.

Patient. 2014;7(4):365-86. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2. Review.

PMID:
24872225
11.

How important is health status in defining quality of life for older people? An exploratory study of the views of older South Australians.

Milte CM, Walker R, Luszcz MA, Lancsar E, Kaambwa B, Ratcliffe J.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0068-3.

PMID:
24254996
12.

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, Bresnahan BW, Kanninen B, Bridges JF.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.

PMID:
23337210
13.

Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application.

Lancsar E, Louviere J, Donaldson C, Currie G, Burgess L.

Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;76(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

PMID:
23159304
14.

Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE.

Baker R, Chilton S, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Mason H, Metcalf H, Pennington M, Wildman J.

Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Oct;6(4):435-47. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000181. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

PMID:
21854688
15.

Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments.

Lancsar E, Wildman J, Donaldson C, Ryan M, Baker R.

J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):466-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

PMID:
21310500
16.

The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise?

Donaldson C, Baker R, Mason H, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Wildman J, Bateman I, Loomes G, Robinson A, Sugden R, Prades JL, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 11;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-8.

17.

Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project.

Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, Mason H, Odejar M, Pinto Prades JL, Robinson A, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R, Sugden R, Wildman J; SVQ Research Team.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(27):1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta14270.

18.

Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women's views on alternative packages of care.

Deverill M, Lancsar E, Snaith VB, Robson SC.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jul;151(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.015. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

PMID:
20456855
19.

Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.

Louviere JJ, Lancsar E.

Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Oct;4(Pt 4):527-46. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990193.

PMID:
19715635
20.

Sources of variation in the costs of health care for asthma patients in Australia.

Kenny P, Hall J, King M, Lancsar E.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jul;14(3):133-40. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008078.

PMID:
19541871
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk