Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 15


Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection.

Leong DL, Rainford L, Haygood TM, Whitman GJ, Geiser WR, Stephens TW, Davis PL, Brennan PC.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 1;31(11):2328-33. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.002328.


Stereoscopic interpretation of low-dose breast tomosynthesis projection images.

Muralidhar GS, Markey MK, Bovik AC, Haygood TM, Stephens TW, Geiser WR, Garg N, Adrada BE, Dogan BE, Carkaci S, Khisty R, Whitman GJ.

J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr;27(2):248-54. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9648-x.


How to establish a cost-effective mobile mammography program.

Carkaci S, Geiser WR, Adrada BE, Marquez C, Whitman GJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):W691-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9825.


Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD, Black WC, Brewer B, Church TR, Clingan KL, Duan F, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis CA, Gierada DS, Jain A, Jones GC, Mahon I, Marcus PM, Rathmell JM, Sicks J; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team.

N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208962.


Trend of contrast detection threshold with and without localization.

Leong DL, Rainford L, Haygood TM, Whitman GJ, Geiser WR, Adrada BE, Santiago L, Brennan PC.

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1099-106. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9589-4.


ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, Geiser WR, Karellas A, Mainiero MB, Martin MC, Patel SB, Rubin DL, Shepard JD, Siegel EL, Wolfman JA, Mian TA, Mahoney MC.

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb;26(1):10-25. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9521-3. No abstract available.


Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.

Leong DL, Rainford L, Haygood TM, Whitman GJ, Tchou PM, Geiser WR, Carkaci S, Brennan PC.

J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct;25(5):662-9.


Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Liu X, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ, Geiser WR, Shen Y, Yi Y, Shaw CC.

Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6489-501. doi: 10.1118/1.3659709.


Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography.

Geiser WR, Haygood TM, Santiago L, Stephens T, Thames D, Whitman GJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):W1023-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7246. Review.


Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD.

N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.


The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, Church TR, Fagerstrom RM, Galen B, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Goldin J, Gohagan JK, Hillman B, Jaffe C, Kramer BS, Lynch D, Marcus PM, Schnall M, Sullivan DC, Sullivan D, Zylak CJ.

Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091808. Epub 2010 Nov 2.


Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography.

Tchou PM, Haygood TM, Atkinson EN, Stephens TW, Davis PL, Arribas EM, Geiser WR, Whitman GJ.

Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):40-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092170. Epub 2010 Aug 2.


Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors.

Rong XJ, Krugh KT, Shepard SJ, Geiser WR.

Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1768-75.


Optimal technique factors for magnification mammography.

Huda W, Steinbach BG, Geiser WR, Belden CJ.

Invest Radiol. 1997 Jul;32(7):378-81.


Effect of patient support pads on image quality and dose in fluoroscopy.

Geiser WR, Huda W, Gkanatsios NA.

Med Phys. 1997 Mar;24(3):377-82.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk