Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nat Methods. 2013 Mar;10(3):228-38. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2365. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.

Erratum in

  • Nat Methods. 2013 May;10(5):445.

Abstract

Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis.

PMID:
23396282
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3906045
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk