Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 19

1.

Does the sex difference in competitiveness decrease in selective sub-populations? A test with intercollegiate distance runners.

Deaner RO, Lowen A, Rogers W, Saksa E.

PeerJ. 2015 Apr 21;3:e884. doi: 10.7717/peerj.884. eCollection 2015.

2.

U.S. masters track participation reveals a stable sex difference in competitiveness.

Deaner RO, Addona V, Mead MP.

Evol Psychol. 2014 Oct 6;12(5):848-77.

PMID:
25300067
3.

Misrepresentations of evolutionary psychology in sex and gender textbooks.

Winegard BM, Winegard BM, Deaner RO.

Evol Psychol. 2014 May 20;12(3):474-508.

PMID:
25299988
4.

You can't teach speed: sprinters falsify the deliberate practice model of expertise.

Lombardo MP, Deaner RO.

PeerJ. 2014 Jun 26;2:e445. doi: 10.7717/peerj.445. eCollection 2014.

5.

Men are more likely than women to slow in the marathon.

Deaner RO, Carter RE, Joyner MJ, Hunter SK.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Mar;47(3):607-16. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000432.

PMID:
24983344
6.

Born at the wrong time: selection bias in the NHL draft.

Deaner RO, Lowen A, Cobley S.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057753. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

7.

Physiology does not explain all sex differences in running performance.

Deaner RO.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jan;45(1):146-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182690110. No abstract available.

PMID:
23247671
8.

A sex difference in the predisposition for physical competition: males play sports much more than females even in the contemporary U.S.

Deaner RO, Geary DC, Puts DA, Ham SA, Kruger J, Fles E, Winegard B, Grandis T.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049168. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

9.

Distance running as an ideal domain for showing a sex difference in competitiveness.

Deaner RO.

Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Apr;42(3):413-28. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9965-z. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

PMID:
22700008
10.
11.
12.

Mirroring of attention by neurons in macaque parietal cortex.

Shepherd SV, Klein JT, Deaner RO, Platt ML.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9489-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900419106. Epub 2009 May 22.

13.

Neural correlates of social target value in macaque parietal cortex.

Klein JT, Deaner RO, Platt ML.

Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 25;18(6):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.047.

14.

Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates.

Deaner RO, Isler K, Burkart J, van Schaik C.

Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70(2):115-24. Epub 2007 May 18. Review.

PMID:
17510549
15.

Economic principles motivating social attention in humans.

Hayden BY, Parikh PC, Deaner RO, Platt ML.

Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jul 22;274(1619):1751-6.

16.

Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men.

Deaner RO, Shepherd SV, Platt ML.

Biol Lett. 2007 Feb 22;3(1):64-7.

17.

Social status gates social attention in monkeys.

Shepherd SV, Deaner RO, Platt ML.

Curr Biol. 2006 Feb 21;16(4):R119-20. No abstract available.

18.

Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques.

Deaner RO, Khera AV, Platt ML.

Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 29;15(6):543-8.

19.

Reflexive social attention in monkeys and humans.

Deaner RO, Platt ML.

Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 16;13(18):1609-13.

PMID:
13678591
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk