Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 33

1.

Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis genomic landscape: comparative genomics reveals variations in ploidy and nutrient utilisation potential amongst wine isolates.

Borneman AR, Zeppel R, Chambers PJ, Curtin CD.

PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 13;10(2):e1004161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004161. eCollection 2014 Feb.

2.

Evaluation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for the reduction of alcohol content in wine.

Contreras A, Hidalgo C, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ, Curtin C, Varela C.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Mar;80(5):1670-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03780-13. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

3.

Influence of yeast strain on Shiraz wine quality indicators.

Holt H, Cozzolino D, McCarthy J, Abrahamse C, Holt S, Solomon M, Smith P, Chambers PJ, Curtin C.

Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Aug 1;165(3):302-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 24.

PMID:
23803572
4.

Introducing a new breed of wine yeast: interspecific hybridisation between a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast and Saccharomyces mikatae.

Bellon JR, Schmid F, Capone DL, Dunn BL, Chambers PJ.

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e62053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062053. Print 2013.

5.

Comparative genomics: a revolutionary tool for wine yeast strain development.

Borneman AR, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ.

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Apr;24(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 1. Review.

PMID:
22947601
6.

Comparative analysis of the Oenococcus oeni pan genome reveals genetic diversity in industrially-relevant pathways.

Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 3;13:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-373.

7.

Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine yeasts.

Varela C, Kutyna DR, Solomon MR, Black CA, Borneman A, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(17):6068-77. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01279-12. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

8.

The winemaker's bug: From ancient wisdom to opening new vistas with frontier yeast science.

Pretorius IS, Curtin CD, Chambers PJ.

Bioeng Bugs. 2012 May-Jun;3(3):147-56. doi: 10.4161/bbug.19687. Epub 2012 May 1. Review.

9.

De-novo assembly and analysis of the heterozygous triploid genome of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis AWRI1499.

Curtin CD, Borneman AR, Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033840. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

10.

Functional divergence in the genus Oenococcus as predicted by genome sequencing of the newly-described species, Oenococcus kitaharae.

Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029626. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

11.

The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins.

Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

12.

Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production.

Kutyna DR, Varela C, Stanley GA, Borneman AR, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Feb;93(3):1175-84. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3622-7. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
21989563
13.

Newly generated interspecific wine yeast hybrids introduce flavour and aroma diversity to wines.

Bellon JR, Eglinton JM, Siebert TE, Pollnitz AP, Rose L, de Barros Lopes M, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Aug;91(3):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3294-3. Epub 2011 May 3.

PMID:
21538112
14.

Impacts of variations in elemental nutrient concentration of Chardonnay musts on Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation kinetics and wine composition.

Schmidt SA, Dillon S, Kolouchova R, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jul;91(2):365-75. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3197-3. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

PMID:
21476141
15.

Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ.

PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb 3;7(2):e1001287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001287.

16.

A novel methodology independent of fermentation rate for assessment of the fructophilic character of wine yeast strains.

Liccioli T, Chambers PJ, Jiranek V.

J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jul;38(7):833-43. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0854-y. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

PMID:
21076969
17.

Microvinification--how small can we go?

Liccioli T, Tran TM, Cozzolino D, Jiranek V, Chambers PJ, Schmidt SA.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Mar;89(5):1621-8. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2992-6. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

PMID:
21076919
18.

Fermenting knowledge: the history of winemaking, science and yeast research.

Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS.

EMBO Rep. 2010 Dec;11(12):914-20. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.179. Epub 2010 Nov 12. No abstract available.

19.

Transcriptional changes associated with ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Stanley D, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA, Borneman A, Fraser S.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;88(1):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2760-7. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

PMID:
20661734
20.

Retrotransposon expression in ethanol-stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Stanley D, Fraser S, Stanley GA, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Jul;87(4):1447-54. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2562-y.

PMID:
20393705
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk