Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Consensus pan-genome assembly of the specialised wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni.

Sternes PR, Borneman AR.

BMC Genomics. 2016 Apr 27;17(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2604-7.

2.

Heterologous production of raspberry ketone in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via pathway engineering and synthetic enzyme fusion.

Lee D, Lloyd ND, Pretorius IS, Borneman AR.

Microb Cell Fact. 2016 Mar 4;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0446-2.

3.

Whole Genome Comparison Reveals High Levels of Inbreeding and Strain Redundancy Across the Spectrum of Commercial Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Kolouchova R, Fraser JA, Schmidt SA.

G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Apr 7;6(4):957-71. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.025692.

4.

Comparative phenomics and targeted use of genomics reveals variation in carbon and nitrogen assimilation among different Brettanomyces bruxellensis strains.

Crauwels S, Van Assche A, de Jonge R, Borneman AR, Verreth C, Troels P, De Samblanx G, Marchal K, Van de Peer Y, Willems KA, Verstrepen KJ, Curtin CD, Lievens B.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;99(21):9123-34. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6769-9. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

PMID:
26135985
5.

Genomic insights into the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex.

Borneman AR, Pretorius IS.

Genetics. 2015 Feb;199(2):281-91. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.173633. Review.

6.

Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis genomic landscape: comparative genomics reveals variations in ploidy and nutrient utilisation potential amongst wine isolates.

Borneman AR, Zeppel R, Chambers PJ, Curtin CD.

PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 13;10(2):e1004161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004161. eCollection 2014 Feb.

7.

At the cutting-edge of grape and wine biotechnology.

Borneman AR, Schmidt SA, Pretorius IS.

Trends Genet. 2013 Apr;29(4):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Review.

PMID:
23218459
8.

Comparative genomics: a revolutionary tool for wine yeast strain development.

Borneman AR, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ.

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Apr;24(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 1. Review.

PMID:
22947601
9.

Comparative analysis of the Oenococcus oeni pan genome reveals genetic diversity in industrially-relevant pathways.

Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 3;13:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-373.

10.

De-novo assembly and analysis of the heterozygous triploid genome of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis AWRI1499.

Curtin CD, Borneman AR, Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033840. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

11.

Functional divergence in the genus Oenococcus as predicted by genome sequencing of the newly-described species, Oenococcus kitaharae.

Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029626. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

12.

The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins.

Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

13.

Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production.

Kutyna DR, Varela C, Stanley GA, Borneman AR, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Feb;93(3):1175-84. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3622-7. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
21989563
14.

Genomic variations of Oenococcus oeni strains and the potential to impact on malolactic fermentation and aroma compounds in wine.

Bartowsky EJ, Borneman AR.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Nov;92(3):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3546-2. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Review.

PMID:
21870044
15.

Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ.

PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb 3;7(2):e1001287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001287.

16.

Genotypic diversity in Oenococcus oeni by high-density microarray comparative genome hybridization and whole genome sequencing.

Borneman AR, Bartowsky EJ, McCarthy J, Chambers PJ.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Mar;86(2):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2425-6. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

PMID:
20111862
17.

Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain.

Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Nov;8(7):1185-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00434.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

18.

Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species.

Borneman AR, Gianoulis TA, Zhang ZD, Yu H, Rozowsky J, Seringhaus MR, Wang LY, Gerstein M, Snyder M.

Science. 2007 Aug 10;317(5839):815-9.

19.

Transcription factor binding site identification in yeast: a comparison of high-density oligonucleotide and PCR-based microarray platforms.

Borneman AR, Zhang ZD, Rozowsky J, Seringhaus MR, Gerstein M, Snyder M.

Funct Integr Genomics. 2007 Oct;7(4):335-45. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

PMID:
17638031
20.

Yeast systems biology: modelling the winemaker's art.

Borneman AR, Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS.

Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Aug;25(8):349-55. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
17590464
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk