Background: Impaired response to dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with worse cardiovascular outcome. Besides antiplatelet effects, there is evidence that both clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) have anti-inflammatory properties. However, little is known about the relationship between platelet function and inflammation under dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation of platelet function with soluble (s)P-selectin and soluble (s)CD40L in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Poor response to ASA and clopidogrel could lead to increased levels of inflammatory markers.
Methods: A total of 148 patients were included. Eighty percent of the patients were on 100 mg ASA and all patients were clopidogrel naive. They underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel. Platelet function was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein analysis at baseline, 24 h after loading, and after 1 month of maintenance therapy, respectively. Plasma levels of sP-selectin and sCD40L were measured. To classify low responders to clopidogrel, patients were screened for genetic variants determining clopidogrel absorption and metabolization.
Results: sP-selectin levels correlated with LTA findings after stimulation with arachidonic acid (P=0.012). Further, in addition to decreased platelet reactivity observed on LTA, lower sP-selectin levels were seen in patients under ASA therapy (P=0.004). CYP2C19*2 allele carriers had a higher platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading measured by adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation in LTA (P=0.008) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (P=0.035); however, there was no difference in the inflammatory markers. Multiple regression analysis showed that variables significantly related to sP-selectin plasma levels were sCD40L (P<0.001), LTA after stimulation with arachidonic acid (P<0.001), adenosine diphosphate (20 µmol/l, P=0.009), collagen (P<0.001), and ejection fraction (P=0.001).
Conclusion: sP-selectin was decreased in patients receiving ASA but did not reflect a CYP2C19*2-defined clopidogrel response. This underlines that sP-selectin is a useful marker for ASA, but not for clopidogrel response, in stable coronary artery disease.