Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Proteome Res. 2010 Feb 5;9(2):1032-40. doi: 10.1021/pr900927y.

Comparison of extensive protein fractionation and repetitive LC-MS/MS analyses on depth of analysis for complex proteomes.

Author information

  • 1The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

Abstract

In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates to systematically compare the commonly used GeLC-MS/MS (1-D protein + 1-D peptide separation) method using four repetitive injections (2-D/repetitive) with a 3-D method that included solution isoelectric focusing and involved an equal number of LC-MS/MS runs. The 3-D method detected substantially more unique peptides and proteins, including higher numbers of unique peptides from low-abundance proteins, demonstrating that additional fractionation at the protein level is more effective than repetitive analyses at overcoming LC-MS/MS undersampling. Importantly, more than 90% of the 2-D/repetitive protein identifications were found in the 3-D method data in a direct protein level comparison, and the reproducibility between data sets increased to greater than 96% when factors such as database redundancy and use of rigid scoring thresholds were considered. Hence, high reproducibility of complex proteomes, such as human cancer cell lysates, readily can be achieved when using multidimensional separation methods with good depth of analysis.

PMID:
20014860
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2870931
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (6)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for American Chemical Society Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk