Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):545-8.

Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.

Author information

  • 1VISN19 MIRECC, Denver Veterans Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. hal.wortzel@uchsc.edu

Abstract

In Clark v. Arizona, the U.S. Supreme Court was faced with two main questions: Does Arizona's insanity defense statute, with its abridged M'Naughten standard, violate the Fourteenth Amendment? And does Arizona case law, with its complete prohibition on the use of mental disease or defect evidence to combat required mens rea elements of a crime, violate due process? In a six-three decision, the Court answered both of these questions in the negative.

PMID:
17185487
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk