Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Sep;36(5):226-31.

Assessing disability in older adults: the effects of asking questions with and without health attribution.

Author information

  • 1Center for Rehabilitation Effectiveness, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. nicdubuc@bu.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effects of using questions with and without health attribution on scores derived from a self-report disability instrument.

METHODS:

We administered the disability component of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument to 75 community-dwelling older adults. Then, we administered the same 16 questions with attribution to specific health conditions. We used a series of analytic methods including weighted Kappa coefficient, Bowker's Test of Symmetry and Rasch analysis to assess the effects of attribution formats.

RESULTS:

A higher prevalence of disability was reported in the non-health attributed compared with the health attributed questions (t = 5.76; p < 0.001, 95% CI 3.8-7.8). Item analyses indicated that participants were significantly more likely to report disability on the non-health attributed version on 4 of the 16 questions.

CONCLUSION:

For community-dwelling older adults, the use of a non-health attribution format may be preferable in instruments designed to assess prevalence of disability from contributing factors other than just health.

PMID:
15626163
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk