Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):188-93.

Securitization of tobacco settlement payments to reduce states' conflict of interest.

Author information

  • 1Yale Schools of Public Health and Medicine, USA. jody.sindelar@yale.edu

Abstract

Securitization of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) payments from tobacco companies is hotly debated in states and policy circles. Securitization is issuing a bond backed by future payments in return for up-front money. Many public health advocates are strongly against securitization. However, securitization itself does not rob states of tobacco control. Rather, the issue is lack of commitment to tobacco control by states. Further, securitization can mitigate states' conflict of interest between keeping tobacco companies fiscally healthy to ensure their MSA payments and reducing tobacco sales for health reasons. States should not align with tobacco companies with the common interest of keeping tobacco companies fiscally healthy.

PMID:
15371384
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk