Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Endod. 2004 Mar;30(3):167-72.

Evaluation of ultrasonically placed MTA and fracture resistance with intracanal composite resin in a model of apexification.

Author information

  • 1Department of Endodontics, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, Texas, USA.


The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether intracoronal delivery of an apical barrier of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) placed ultrasonically, non-ultrasonically, or ultrasonically with the addition of an intracanal composite resin provided a better seal against bacterial leakage. A second purpose was to determine whether intracanal composite resin or gutta-percha and sealer placed against an apical barrier of MTA provided greater resistance to root fracture. In a standardized in vitro open apex model, MTA was placed as an apical barrier at a thickness of 4 mm, with and without ultrasonic vibration. The barriers were challenged with bacteria exposure within a leakage model, and fracture resistance was assessed with increasing forces applied via an Instron machine. After 45 days, the addition of ultrasonics significantly improved the MTA seal, compared with the non-ultrasonics treatment (Kruskal Wallis nonparametric ANOVA with Dunn multiple comparison test p < 0.05). Bacterial leakage occurred in 6 (33%) of 18 in the non-ultrasonic MTA group, 2 (11%) of 18 in the ultrasonic MTA group, and 1 (6%) of 18 in the ultrasonic MTA-composite group. There were no significant differences at 90 days. A 4-mm thickness of MTA followed with an intracanal composite resin demonstrated a significantly greater resistance to root fracture than MTA followed with gutta-percha and sealer (one-way ANOVA with Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test, p < 0.01). The MTA-gutta-percha group was not significantly different than the MTA unrestored positive control.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk