Cost-Effectiveness of Tacrolimus Compared With Cyclosporine for Immunosuppression Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Heart Transplant in Colombia

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment in maintenance therapy for adult heart transplant recipients from the Colombian health system perspective.

Methods: We constructed a decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon. A review of the clinical literature was performed to extract probabilities of health events and acute rejections avoided were used as the health outcome. Costs were calculated from the base-case approximation and were obtained from administrative databases in Colombia (Sistema de Información de Precios de Medicamentos 2020 and Suficiencia 2012-2019), and the prices were adjusted to US dollar 2021.

Results: Two evaluation results were presented. The first evaluates the tacrolimus + azathioprine + corticosteroid (TAC) scheme compared with cyclosporine + azathioprine + corticosteroid (CAC), in which the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates that 1 additional rejection avoided has a cost of US dollar $5461.09 which, compared with the cost-effectiveness threshold in the base case, indicates that the TAC scheme is not a cost-effective (CE) strategy with respect to the CAC scheme. The second result shows the comparison of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (TMC) with cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (CMC) in which TMC was found to be a dominant alternative to CMC.

Conclusions: The tacrolimus-based immunosuppression scheme is not CE in its TAC scheme, versus CAC, and is dominant in its TMC scheme, versus CMC, sensitivity analyses show that tacrolimus could become a CE alternative in any scheme used against higher cost-effectiveness threshold.