Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

D'Agostino RB Jr.

Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81.

PMID:
9802183
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.

Qin R, Titler MG, Shever LL, Kim T.

Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6. Review.

PMID:
19018219
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR.

Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug 15;150(4):327-33. Review.

PMID:
10453808
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.

Heinze G, J√ľni P.

Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(14):1704-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031. Epub 2011 Feb 28. Review.

PMID:
21362706
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

PMID:
14499048
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.

Klungel OH, Martens EP, Psaty BM, Grobbee DE, Sullivan SD, Stricker BH, Leufkens HG, de Boer A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1223-31. Review.

PMID:
15617947
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Austin PC.

Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2037-49. Review.

PMID:
18038446
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review.

Shah BR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, Austin PC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):550-9. Epub 2005 Apr 19. Review.

PMID:
15878468
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review.

Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Dec;13(12):841-53. Review.

PMID:
15386709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

[Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].

Pattanayak CW, Rubin DB, Zell ER.

Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Aug 27. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
21872981
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.

Schmoor C, Gall C, Stampf S, Graf E.

Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):369-87. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000154. Epub 2011 Feb 10. Review.

PMID:
21308726
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Improving participant selection in disease management programmes: insights gained from propensity score stratification.

Linden A, Adams JL.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):914-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01091.x. Review.

PMID:
19018926
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.

Groenwold RH, Hak E, Hoes AW.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Review.

PMID:
18619797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

[Bias in observational research: 'confounding'].

Groenwold RH.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(13):A4221. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
22456291
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.

Austin PC.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;134(5):1128-35. Review.

PMID:
17976439
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

PMID:
15361314
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
17.

Methods of adjustment for estimating the attributable risk in case-control studies: a review.

Benichou J.

Stat Med. 1991 Nov;10(11):1753-73. Review.

PMID:
1845304
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.

Austin PC.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008 Sep;1(1):62-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.790634. Review.

PMID:
20031790
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.

Greenland S, Robins J.

Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):747-60. Review.

PMID:
8178788
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Clinical trials: how to assess confounding and why so.

Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH.

Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;2(2):129-33. Review.

PMID:
18690860
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk