Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 16

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 9492688)

1.

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate.

Seagroatt V, Stratton I.

BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. No abstract available.

2.

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):421-45. Review.

PMID:
11191259
3.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

4.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
5.

Systematic review of lumbar provocation discography in asymptomatic subjects with a meta-analysis of false-positive rates.

Wolfer LR, Derby R, Lee JE, Lee SH.

Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):513-38. Review.

6.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
7.

[Meta-analyses or megatrials: same level of proof?].

Mismetti P, Cucherat M, Laporte S.

Presse Med. 2007 Mar;36(3 Pt 2):524-30. Epub 2007 Feb 1. Review. French.

PMID:
17275251
8.

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302. Review.

PMID:
18618864
9.
10.

Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.

Egger M, Smith GD, Sterne JA.

Clin Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):478-84. Review.

PMID:
11792089
11.

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.

Finckh A, Tramèr MR.

Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732. Review.

PMID:
18227829
12.

Bias in location and selection of studies.

Egger M, Smith GD.

BMJ. 1998 Jan 3;316(7124):61-6. Review. No abstract available.

13.

A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.

De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P.

Vaccine. 2007 Dec 17;25(52):8794-806. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
18035456
14.

Understanding and evaluating a meta-analysis.

Olson CM.

Acad Emerg Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):392-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
7614289
15.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
16.

Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses.

Noble JH Jr.

J Lab Clin Med. 2006 Jan;147(1):7-20. Review.

PMID:
16443000
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk