Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 17

1.

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity.

Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D.

BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):469; author reply 470-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
9492685
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Williamson PR, Gamble C.

Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1547-61. Review.

PMID:
15580591
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

[Meta-analyses or megatrials: same level of proof?].

Mismetti P, Cucherat M, Laporte S.

Presse Med. 2007 Mar;36(3 Pt 2):524-30. Epub 2007 Feb 1. Review. French.

PMID:
17275251
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):421-45. Review.

PMID:
11191259
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

PMID:
16166360
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.

Xu H, Platt RW, Luo ZC, Wei S, Fraser WD.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;22 Suppl 1:18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00908.x. Review.

PMID:
18237348
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.

De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P.

Vaccine. 2007 Dec 17;25(52):8794-806. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
18035456
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302. Review.

PMID:
18618864
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.

Egger M, Smith GD, Sterne JA.

Clin Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):478-84. Review.

PMID:
11792089
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.

Vaitkus PT, Brar C.

Am Heart J. 2007 Feb;153(2):275-80. Review.

PMID:
17239689
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.

Finckh A, Tramèr MR.

Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732. Review.

PMID:
18227829
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Understanding and evaluating a meta-analysis.

Olson CM.

Acad Emerg Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):392-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
7614289
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Bias in location and selection of studies.

Egger M, Smith GD.

BMJ. 1998 Jan 3;316(7124):61-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9451274
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk