Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

NIH clinical trials and publication bias.

Dickersin K, Min YI.

Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Apr 28;Doc No 50:[4967 words; 53 paragraphs].

PMID:
8306005
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Plosker GL, Figgitt DP.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. Review.

PMID:
15099124
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Full publication of clinical trials presented at a national maternal-fetal medicine meeting: is there a publication bias?

Blackwell SC, Thompson L, Refuerzo J.

Am J Perinatol. 2009 Oct;26(9):679-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220786. Epub 2009 Apr 23. Review.

PMID:
19391085
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Wilby J, Kainth A, Hawkins N, Epstein D, McIntosh H, McDaid C, Mason A, Golder S, O'Meara S, Sculpher M, Drummond M, Forbes C.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
15842952
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Bias in clinical intervention research.

Gluud LL.

Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Mar 15;163(6):493-501. Epub 2006 Jan 27. Review.

PMID:
16443796
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review.

Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA.

JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1233-40. Review.

PMID:
17374817
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.
8.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.

PMID:
16487455
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, Tanajewski L, Turner D, Price A.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. Review.

PMID:
18547499
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.

Geller SE, Adams MG, Carnes M.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Dec;15(10):1123-31. Review.

PMID:
17199453
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.

Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):MR000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3. Review.

PMID:
19160345
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials.

Matthews GA, Dumville JC, Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Sep 1. Review.

PMID:
21889307
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Time-lag bias in trials of pediatric antidepressants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reyes MM, Panza KE, Martin A, Bloch MH.

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;50(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 25. Review.

PMID:
21156271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives from a National Institutes of Health-funded workshop.

Coffey CS, Levin B, Clark C, Timmerman C, Wittes J, Gilbert P, Harris S.

Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):671-80. doi: 10.1177/1740774512461859.

PMID:
23250942
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Results availability from clinical research of female urinary incontinence.

Shamliyan TA, Kane RL, Wyman J, Sainfort F.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):22-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.21220. Epub 2011 Oct 28. Review.

PMID:
22038753
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.

Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, Decullier E, Easterbrook PJ, Von Elm E, Gamble C, Ghersi D, Ioannidis JP, Simes J, Williamson PR.

PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081. Review.

PMID:
18769481
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Determining sample size and power in clinical trials: the forgotten essential.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF.

Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1996 May;14(2):125-31. Review.

PMID:
8796935
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

After inclusion, information and inference: reporting on clinical trials results after 15 years of monitoring inclusion of women.

Foulkes MA.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;20(6):829-36. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2527. Review.

PMID:
21671773
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Evaluating the benefit of clinical trials to future patients.

Hawkins BS.

Control Clin Trials. 1984 Mar;5(1):13-32. Review.

PMID:
6425014
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Evaluation of clinical trials of immunomodulators for prevention of recurrent respiratory infections in children.

Valleron AJ, Grimfeld A.

Dev Biol Stand. 1992;77:149-58. Review.

PMID:
1426656
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk