Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 12

1.

Acceptability and utility of the mySentry remote glucose monitoring system.

Kaiserman K, Buckingham BA, Prakasam G, Gunville F, Slover RH, Wang Y, Nguyen X, Welsh JB.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):356-61.

PMID:
23566993
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Langendam M, Luijf YM, Hooft L, Devries JH, Mudde AH, Scholten RJ.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD008101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008101.pub2. Review.

PMID:
22258980
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.

Shalitin S, Peter Chase H.

Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb;(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x. Review.

PMID:
21323816
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

An overview of continuous glucose monitoring and the ambulatory glucose profile.

Mazze R, Akkerman B, Mettner J.

Minn Med. 2011 Aug;94(8):40-4. Review.

PMID:
21957816
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Quality of life and technology: impact on children and families with diabetes.

Hirose M, Beverly EA, Weinger K.

Curr Diab Rep. 2012 Dec;12(6):711-20. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0313-4. Review.

PMID:
22903783
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Real-time glucose sensors in children and adolescents with type-1 diabetes.

Danne T, Lange K, Kordonouri O.

Horm Res. 2008;70(4):193-202. doi: 10.1159/000151592. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Review.

PMID:
18772591
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: review of the literature and implementation for practical use.

Joubert M, Reznik Y.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;96(3):294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.010. Epub 2011 Dec 28. Review.

PMID:
22209014
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Beneficial effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system on glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Szypowska A, Ramotowska A, Dzygalo K, Golicki D.

Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Apr;166(4):567-74. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0642. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
22096111
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Efficacy and safety comparison of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wojciechowski P, Ryś P, Lipowska A, Gawęska M, Małecki MT.

Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011 Oct;121(10):333-43. Review.

PMID:
22045094
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N, Ranasinghe P, Berger Z, Suh YD, Wilson LM, Haberl EB, Brick J, Bass EB, Golden SH.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 4;157(5):336-47. Review.

PMID:
22777524
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring in diabetes: summary of a comparative effectiveness review.

Golden SH, Sapir T.

J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Aug;18(6 Suppl):S1-17. Review.

PMID:
22984955
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

[Insulin therapy by insulin pump: continuous or conventional self-blood glucose monitoring? ].

Renard E.

Diabetes Metab. 2003 Apr;29(2 Pt 2):S54-62. Review. French.

PMID:
12746628
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk