Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 10

1.

Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain.

Whynes DK, McCahon RA, Ravenscroft A, Hodgkinson V, Evley R, Hardman JG.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.003.

2.

Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

DeVine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney DR, Vaccaro A, Wang J, Andersson G.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de. Review.

PMID:
21897347
3.

Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.

Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 1;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-110. Review.

4.

Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.

Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d. Review.

PMID:
21952190
5.

Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies.

Wu AW, Hanson KA, Harding G, Haider S, Tawadrous M, Khachatryan A, Pashos CL, Simpson KN.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 12;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-42. Review.

6.

Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to clinical change: is the patient experience adequately represented?

Tordrup D, Mossman J, Kanavos P.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):10-19. Review.

PMID:
24499622
7.

A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders.

Tosh J, Brazier J, Evans P, Longworth L.

Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Review.

8.

The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review.

Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Apr;14(2):221-33. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894462. Review.

PMID:
24625040
9.

Pain assessment: the advantages of using pain scales in lysosomal storage diseases.

Cleeland CS.

Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2002;91(439):43-7. Review.

PMID:
12572842
10.

Limited responsiveness related to the minimal important difference of patient-reported outcomes in rare diseases.

Johnston BC, Miller PA, Agarwal A, Mulla S, Khokhar R, De Oliveira K, Hitchcock CL, Sadeghirad B, Mohiuddin M, Sekercioglu N, Seweryn M, Koperny M, Bala MM, Adams-Webber T, Granados A, Hamed A, Crawford MW, van der Ploeg AT, Guyatt GH.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 2. pii: S0895-4356(16)30187-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.06.010. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
27381737
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk