Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 31

1.

Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.

Knudsen AB, Hur C, Gazelle GS, Schrag D, McFarland EG, Kuntz KM.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):611-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00005.

2.

An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Kriza C, Emmert M, Wahlster P, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Review.

PMID:
23938237
3.

A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Fecal Occult Blood Tests with Different Test Characteristics in the Context of Annual Screening in the Medicare Population [Internet].

van Ballegooijen M, Habbema JDF, Boer R, Zauber AG, Brown ML.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2003 Aug 09.

4.

Cost-Effectiveness of DNA Stool Testing to Screen for Colorectal Cancer [Internet].

Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Dec 20.

5.

What is the value of computered tomography colonography in patients screening positive for fecal occult blood? A systematic review and economic evaluation.

Walleser S, Griffiths A, Lord SJ, Howard K, Solomon MJ, Gebski V.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;5(12):1439-46; quiz 1368. Review.

PMID:
18054752
6.

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy.

Zauber AG.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;20(4):751-70. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.008. Review.

7.

Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendsé DA, Taylor SA, Mallett S.

Eur Radiol. 2014 May;24(5):1049-58. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3106-0. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Review.

PMID:
24519111
8.

Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.

Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):108-13. Review.

9.

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, Rutter CM, Webber EM, O'Connor E, Smith N, Whitlock EP.

JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):545.

PMID:
27305422
10.

Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.

Dinh TA, Alperin P, Walter LC, Smith R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):730-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1972-6. Epub 2012 Jan 12. Review.

11.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Hanly P, Skally M, Fenlon H, Sharp L.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):415-23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000542. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Review.

PMID:
23006522
12.

Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):638-58. Epub 2008 Oct 6. Review.

PMID:
18838718
13.

Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Lieberman D.

Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2115-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Feb 16. Review.

PMID:
20167216
14.

A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.

van Gils P, van den Berg M, van Kranen H, de Wit AG.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jun;45(9):1554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Mar 2. Review.

PMID:
19261464
15.

The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Schoen RE.

Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Jan;2(1):65-70. Review.

PMID:
11902587
16.

[Colorectal cancer mass screening: present and future].

Bretagne JF, Manfredi S, Heresbach D.

Presse Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):1054-63. Epub 2007 May 3. Review. French.

PMID:
17481847
17.

Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.

Patel SS, Kilgore ML.

Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. Review.

18.

[Colonoscopy, the primary tool for colonic screening].

Péter Z, Tulassay Z.

Orv Hetil. 2009 Feb 15;150(7):299-304. doi: 10.1556/OH.2009.28552. Review. Hungarian.

PMID:
19189893
19.

Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical application.

He Q, Rao T, Guan YS.

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13820-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13820. Review.

20.

[Validity of Recommendations for Secondary Prevention of Colon Cancer].

Porzsolt F, Ittner D, Henne-Bruns D.

Zentralbl Chir. 2015 Aug;140(4):390-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328074. Epub 2013 Jan 25. Review. German.

PMID:
23354740
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk