Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 15

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 23083852)

1.

Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.

Ellimoottil C, Polcari A, Kadlec A, Gupta G.

J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.105. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

PMID:
23083852
2.

Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.

O'Neill SC, Baker JF, Fitzgerald C, Fleming C, Rowan F, Byrne D, Synnott K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):E645-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000282. Review.

PMID:
24583736
3.

Concussion information online: evaluation of information quality, content and readability of concussion-related websites.

Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, McCrory PR.

Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;46(9):675-83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081620. Epub 2011 Apr 18. Review.

PMID:
21504964
4.

The quality and accuracy of internet information on the subject of ear tubes.

McKearney TC, McKearney RM.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;77(6):894-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Review.

PMID:
23587675
5.

Radiology and the internet: a systematic review of patient information resources.

Smart JM, Burling D.

Clin Radiol. 2001 Nov;56(11):867-70. Review.

PMID:
11603887
6.

Quality and accuracy assessment of nutrition information on the Web for cancer prevention.

Shahar S, Shirley N, Noah SA.

Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Jan;38(1):15-26. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.710684. Epub 2012 Sep 7. Review.

PMID:
22957981
7.

A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org.

Hansberry DR, John A, John E, Agarwal N, Gonzales SF, Baker SR.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):566-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11223. Review.

PMID:
24555593
8.

Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2572-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y. Review.

9.

Systematic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea websites on the internet.

Langille M, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Shanavaz SA, Massoud E.

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;41(4):265-72. Review.

PMID:
22935178
10.

Quality of information on the internet related to bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review of the evidence.

Tirlapur SA, Leiu C, Khan KS.

Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2091-1. Epub 2013 Apr 20. Review.

PMID:
23604231
11.

A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.

Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L.

Health Educ Behav. 2006 Jun;33(3):352-73. Review.

PMID:
16699125
12.

Information on the internet for asplenic patients: a systematic review.

Downing MA, Omar AH, Sabri E, McCarthy AE.

Can J Surg. 2011 Aug;54(4):232-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005510. Review.

13.

Systematic review of the types of methods and approaches used to assess the effectiveness of healthcare information websites.

Tieman J, Bradley SL.

Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):319-24. doi: 10.1071/PY13030. Review.

PMID:
24004691
14.

Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.

Pires C, Vigário M, Cavaco A.

Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:4. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Review.

15.

Cancer survivorship websites and resources.

Economou D, Grant M, McCabe M.

J Adv Pract Oncol. 2012 May;3(3):170-3. Review. No abstract available.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk