Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

The effect of a Lean quality improvement implementation program on surgical pathology specimen accessioning and gross preparation error frequency.

Smith ML, Wilkerson T, Grzybicki DM, Raab SS.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;138(3):367-73. doi: 10.1309/AJCP3YXID2UHZPHT.

2.

Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.

Meier FA, Varney RC, Zarbo RJ.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2011 Sep;18(5):406-13. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318229bf20. Review.

PMID:
21841408
3.

Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.

Valenstein PN, Sirota RL.

Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):979-96, vii. Review.

PMID:
15555752
4.

Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.

Roy JE, Hunt JL.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2010 Sep;17(5):359-65. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181ece0db. Review.

PMID:
20733354
5.

A primer on the cost of quality for improvement of laboratory and pathology specimen processes.

Carlson RO, Amirahmadi F, Hernandez JS.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;138(3):347-54. doi: 10.1309/AJCPSMQYAF6X1HUT. Review.

6.

Using LEAN principles to improve quality, patient safety, and workflow in histology and anatomic pathology.

Serrano L, Hegge P, Sato B, Richmond B, Stahnke L.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2010 May;17(3):215-21. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181d98c81. Review.

PMID:
20418676
7.

Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.

Raab SS.

Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):849-63. Review.

PMID:
15555746
8.

Quality and patient safety in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Raab SS, Swain J, Smith N, Grzybicki DM.

Clin Biochem. 2013 Sep;46(13-14):1180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 May 2. Review.

9.

Role of Informatics in Patient Safety and Quality Assurance.

Nakhleh RE.

Surg Pathol Clin. 2015 Jun;8(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Review.

PMID:
26065802
10.

Directed peer review in surgical pathology.

Smith ML, Raab SS.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2012 Sep;19(5):331-7. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31826661b7. Review.

PMID:
22885382
12.

Error-free pathology: applying lean production methods to anatomic pathology.

Condel JL, Sharbaugh DT, Raab SS.

Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):865-99. Review.

PMID:
15555747
13.

Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention.

Hollensead SC, Lockwood WB, Elin RJ.

J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec 1;88(3):161-81. Review.

PMID:
15562462
14.

Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology.

Goldstein NS.

Clin Lab Med. 1999 Dec;19(4):743-56, v. Review.

PMID:
10572712
15.

The efficient operation of the surgical pathology gross room.

Bell WC, Young ES, Billings PE, Grizzle WE.

Biotech Histochem. 2008 Apr;83(2):71-82. doi: 10.1080/10520290802127610. Review. Erratum in: Biotech Histochem. 2008 Jun;83(3):209.

16.

Diagnostic 'errors' in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories.

Leong AS, Braye S, Bhagwandeen B.

Pathology. 2006 Dec;38(6):490-7. Review.

PMID:
17393975
17.

The laboratory is a key partner in assuring patient safety.

Stankovic AK.

Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):1023-35. Review.

PMID:
15555754
18.

Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology.

Nakhleh RE.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Feb;132(2):181-5. doi: 10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[181:PSAERI]2.0.CO;2. Review.

PMID:
18251572
19.

[Safety management in pathology laboratory: from specimen handling to confirmation of reports].

Minato H, Nojima T, Nakano M, Yamazaki M.

Rinsho Byori. 2011 Mar;59(3):299-304. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
21560413
20.

[CAP quality management system in clinical laboratory and its issue].

Tazawa H.

Rinsho Byori. 2004 Mar;52(3):266-9. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
15137328
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk