Format
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 4

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 22844058)

1.

The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.

Derikx LC, van Aken JB, Janssen D, Snyers A, van der Linden YM, Verdonschot N, Tanck E.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1135-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28449.

PMID:
22844058
2.

How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?

van den Munckhof S, Zadpoor AA.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Apr;29(4):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Jan 10. Review.

PMID:
24485865
3.

Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects.

Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Mar;(312):120-35. Review.

PMID:
7634597
4.

Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases.

Van der Linden YM, Dijkstra PD, Kroon HM, Lok JJ, Noordijk EM, Leer JW, Marijnen CA.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 May;86(4):566-73. Review.

Format
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk