Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 7

1.

Commentary: grading: what is it good for?

Durning SJ, Hemmer PA.

Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1002-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0b3a.

PMID:
22827984
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Anatomy of a clerkship test.

Senecal EL, Askew K, Gorney B, Beeson MS, Manthey DE.

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 2:S31-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00880.x. Review.

PMID:
21199081
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Implementing a systematic course/clerkship peer review process.

Burke MJ, Bonaminio G, Walling A.

Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):930-1. Review.

PMID:
12228100
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

An international strategic plan to preserve and restore vision: four curricula of ophthalmic education.

Tso MO, Goldberg MF, Lee AG, Selvarajah S, Parrish RK 2nd, Zagorski Z.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):859-65. Review.

PMID:
17452171
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Systematic review of grading practice: is there evidence of grade inflation?

Donaldson JH, Gray M.

Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Mar;12(2):101-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 29. Review.

PMID:
22129576
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Educational practice guidelines for a surgical clerkship.

Dunnington GL.

Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Sep-Oct;2(5):214-8. Review.

PMID:
9450409
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review.

Dory V, Gagnon R, Vanpee D, Charlin B.

Med Educ. 2012 Jun;46(6):552-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04211.x. Review.

PMID:
22626047
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk