Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 23

1.

What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?

Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ.

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):44-66. doi: 10.1177/0163278712446066. Epub 2012 May 21.

PMID:
22615498
2.

Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.

Donaldson NE, Rutledge DN, Ashley J.

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 Suppl 1:S41-51. Review.

PMID:
17129334
3.

Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.

Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Review.

4.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
5.

Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM.

Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. Review.

6.

Opportunities for small nutrition-related cancer research grants (R03) from the National Cancer Institute.

Nicastro HL, Seifried HE, Milner JA.

J Nutr. 2011 Oct;141(10):1765-8. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.144261. Epub 2011 Aug 24. Review.

7.

Conceptual model of comprehensive research metrics for improved human health and environment.

Engel-Cox JA, Van Houten B, Phelps J, Rose SW.

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 May;116(5):583-92. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10925. Review.

8.

Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review.

Rabin BA, Glasgow RE, Kerner JF, Klump MP, Brownson RC.

Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):443-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.035. Review.

PMID:
20307814
9.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

10.

Understanding the internal and external validity of health literacy interventions: a systematic literature review using the RE-AIM framework.

Allen K, Zoellner J, Motley M, Estabrooks PA.

J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3:55-72. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604381. Review.

PMID:
21951243
11.

The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?

Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD.

Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Aug;44(2):119-27. Review.

PMID:
11479052
12.

Commentary: A systematic review of health care efficiency measures.

Binder LF, Rudolph B.

Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):806-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00971.x. Epub 2009 Apr 14. Review. No abstract available.

13.

Optimizing evaluation of nursing education programs.

Suhayda R, Miller JM.

Nurse Educ. 2006 Sep-Oct;31(5):200-6. Review.

PMID:
16980822
14.

Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.

Hammad TA, Neyarapally GA, Pinheiro SP, Iyasu S, Rochester G, Dal Pan G.

Clin Trials. 2013;10(3):389-97. doi: 10.1177/1740774513479467. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Review.

PMID:
23508987
15.

Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996-2000.

Estabrooks P, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM.

J Sch Health. 2003 Jan;73(1):21-8. Review.

PMID:
12621720
16.

The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.

Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M.

Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17. Review.

17.

Effectiveness of community-based, nonpharmacological interventions for early-stage dementia: conclusions and recommendations.

Burgener SC, Buettner LL, Beattie E, Rose KM.

J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Mar;35(3):50-7; quiz 58-9. Review.

PMID:
19326829
18.

The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.

Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE.

Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e38-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299. Epub 2013 Apr 18. Review.

19.

School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Dobbins M, Husson H, DeCorby K, LaRocca RL.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2:CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23450577
20.

Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes.

de Haes H, Bensing J.

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 15. Review.

PMID:
19150197
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk