Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

1.

Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.

Kurlansky PA, Argenziano M, Dunton R, Lancey R, Nast E, Stewart A, Williams T, Zapolanski A, Chang H, Tingley J, Smith CR.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.043. Epub 2011 Nov 20.

PMID:
22104669
2.

Is there a surgeon or hospital volume-outcome relationship in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?

Sepehripour AH, Athanasiou T.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Feb;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs448. Epub 2012 Nov 2. Review.

3.

The New York State cardiac registries: history, contributions, limitations, and lessons for future efforts to assess and publicly report healthcare outcomes.

Hannan EL, Cozzens K, King SB 3rd, Walford G, Shah NR.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.051. Review.

4.

The relationship between volume or surgeon specialty and outcome in the surgical treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

von Meyenfeldt EM, Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Post PN, van de Velde CJ, Tollenaar RA, Klomp HM, Wouters MW.

J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jul;7(7):1170-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318257cc45. Review.

PMID:
22617248
5.

Specialty matters in the treatment of lung cancer.

Tieu B, Schipper P.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Summer;24(2):99-105. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.002. Review.

PMID:
22920525
6.

How small is too small? A systematic review of center volume and outcome after cardiac transplantation.

Pettit SJ, Jhund PS, Hawkins NM, Gardner RS, Haj-Yahia S, McMurray JJ, Petrie MC.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Nov;5(6):783-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966630. Epub 2012 Nov 6. Review.

7.

What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons.

Fiala TG.

Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Aug;32(6):751-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12452555. Review.

PMID:
22859547
8.

The impact of frailty on outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

Sepehri A, Beggs T, Hassan A, Rigatto C, Shaw-Daigle C, Tangri N, Arora RC.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):3110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.087. Epub 2014 Aug 7. Review.

PMID:
25199821
9.

Lung cancer resection volume: is procedure volume really an indicator of quality?

Kozower BD, Stukenborg GJ.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Summer;24(2):93-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.007. Review.

PMID:
22920524
10.

The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wouters MW, Gooiker GA, van Sandick JW, Tollenaar RA.

Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1754-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26383. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Review.

11.

In surgeons performing cardiothoracic surgery is sleep deprivation significant in its impact on morbidity or mortality?

Asfour L, Asfour V, McCormack D, Attia R.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;19(3):479-87. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu118. Epub 2014 May 30. Review.

12.

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

Cronenwett JL, Kraiss LW, Cambria RP.

J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1529-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.016. Review.

13.

A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, Hu JC, Shariat SF, Sun M, Vickers AJ.

Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Review.

14.

Regional quality groups in the Society for Vascular Surgery® Vascular Quality Initiative.

Woo K, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Hallett JW, Davies MG, Beck A, Upchurch GR Jr, Weaver FA, Cronenwett JL; Vascular Quality Initiative.

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Review.

15.

Impact of Resident Involvement on Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes: An Analysis of 30,628 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Edelstein AI, Lovecchio FC, Saha S, Hsu WK, Kim JY.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Aug 6;96(15):e131. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
25100784
16.

Do cardiology quality measures actually improve patient outcomes?

Chatterjee P, Joynt KE.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Feb 7;3(1):e000404. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000404. Review. No abstract available.

17.

Surgical volume-to-outcome relationship and monitoring of technical performance in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Kalfa D, Chai P, Bacha E.

Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Aug;35(6):899-905. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0938-y. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Review.

PMID:
24894896
18.

The association between surgical volume, survival and quality of care.

Al-Sahaf M, Lim E.

J Thorac Dis. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S152-5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.08. Review.

19.

Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery.

Weitz J, Koch M, Friess H, B├╝chler MW.

Dig Surg. 2004;21(4):253-61. Epub 2004 Aug 11. Review.

PMID:
15308864
20.

Quality and safety in pediatric anesthesia.

Varughese AM, Rampersad SE, Whitney GM, Flick RP, Anton B, Heitmiller ES.

Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1408-18. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318294fb4a. Review.

PMID:
24257392
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk