Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 72

1.

Screening mammography in women less than age 50 years.

Kerlikowske K.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834da49a. Review.

PMID:
22037165
2.

Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Ringash J; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

CMAJ. 2001 Feb 20;164(4):469-76. Review. Erratum in: CMAJ 2001 Mar 20;164(6):753.

3.

A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Pace LE, Keating NL.

JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1398. Review.

PMID:
24691608
4.

Screening for breast cancer in England: a review.

Hogben RK.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;20(6):545-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283186fab. Review.

PMID:
18989129
5.

Screening mammography in older women: a review.

Walter LC, Schonberg MA.

JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1336-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2834. Review.

6.

Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD.

JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. Review.

7.

Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians.

Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, Berlin JA, Reynolds EE.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):516-26. Review.

PMID:
17404354
8.

Breast cancer screening. Benefits, risks, and current controversies.

Barton MB.

Postgrad Med. 2005 Aug;118(2):27-8, 33-6, 46. Review.

PMID:
16164103
9.
10.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.

Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, Cawson JN, Morris I, Walleser S, Griffiths A, Parker S, Houssami N.

Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(13):1905-17. Epub 2007 Aug 2. Review.

PMID:
17681781
12.

Breast cancer screening in the older woman: an effective way to reduce mortality?

Paesmans M, Ameye L, Moreau M, Rozenberg S.

Maturitas. 2010 Jul;66(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 6. Review.

PMID:
20451335
13.

Breast cancer screening in women at average risk and high risk.

Griffin JL, Pearlman MD.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1410-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe714e. Review.

PMID:
21099612
14.

The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S, Hoerger T, Siu AL, Atkins D, Klein J, Helfand M; Cost Work Group of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):835-42. Review.

PMID:
14623621
15.

Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age.

Harris R.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):139-43. Review.

PMID:
9709290
16.

Screening for breast cancer.

Eddy DM.

Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):389-99. Review.

PMID:
2504094
17.

Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?

Baker S, Wall M, Bloomfield A.

N Z Med J. 2005 Aug 26;118(1221):U1628. Review.

PMID:
16138166
18.

[Pros and cons of early cancer detection in breast carcinoma].

Callies R, Oberhoff C.

MMW Fortschr Med. 2005 Apr 7;147(14):30-2. Review. German.

PMID:
15887680
19.

Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Review.

20.

Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.

Gartlehner G, Thaler KJ, Chapman A, Kaminski A, Berzaczy D, Van Noord MG, Helbich TH.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Jun;11(2):87-93. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12022. Review.

PMID:
23750571
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk