Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).

Gerhards SA, Huibers MJ, Theunissen KA, de Graaf LE, Widdershoven GA, Evers SM.

Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 May 6.

2.

Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Walters SJ, Brazier JE.

Qual Life Res. 2005 Aug;14(6):1523-32. Review.

PMID:
16110932
3.

Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.

Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 1;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-110. Review.

4.

A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.

Kuspinar A, Mayo NE.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Aug;32(8):759-73. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0167-5. Review.

PMID:
24846760
5.

Systematic review and empirical comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D group mean scores.

Whitehurst DG, Bryan S, Lewis M.

Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):E34-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11421529. Epub 2011 Oct 12. Review.

PMID:
21993430
6.

How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review.

Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Parry G.

Value Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;14(6):907-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Review.

7.

Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis.

Arnold D, Girling A, Stevens A, Lilford R.

BMJ. 2009 Jul 22;339:b2688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2688. Review.

8.

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.

Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Jones ML, Paisley S, O'Cathain A, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Gilbody S, Parry G.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta18340. Review.

9.

A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research.

Whitehurst DG, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S.

Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):646-54. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.46. Epub 2012 May 29. Review.

PMID:
22641255
10.

Measuring health-related quality of life for child maltreatment: a systematic literature review.

Prosser LA, Corso PS.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 16;5:42. Review.

11.

A systematic literature review of utility weights in wet age-related macular degeneration.

Pearson I, Rycroft C, Irving A, Ainsworth C, Wittrup-Jensen K.

J Med Econ. 2013 Nov;16(11):1307-16. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.839946. Epub 2013 Sep 19. Review.

PMID:
24004384
12.

An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment.

Yang Y, Longworth L, Brazier J.

Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2813-28. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0417-6. Epub 2013 May 26. Review.

13.

A review of the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D in people with urinary incontinence.

Davis S, Wailoo A.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Feb 18;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-20. Review.

14.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments.

Wyld M, Morton RL, Hayen A, Howard K, Webster AC.

PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001307. Epub 2012 Sep 11. Review.

15.

A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease.

Dyer MT, Goldsmith KA, Sharples LS, Buxton MJ.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 28;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-13. Review.

16.

A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders.

Tosh J, Brazier J, Evans P, Longworth L.

Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Review.

17.

Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies.

Wu AW, Hanson KA, Harding G, Haider S, Tawadrous M, Khachatryan A, Pashos CL, Simpson KN.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 12;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-42. Review.

18.

[Systematic review of health-related utilities in Spain: the case of mental health].

García-Pérez L, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Pinilla-Domínguez P, Arvelo-Martín A, Linertová R, Rivero-Santana A.

Gac Sanit. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 28. Review. Spanish.

19.

The role of the EQ-5D in the economic evaluation of dermatological conditions and therapies.

Pereira FR, Basra MK, Finlay AY, Salek MS.

Dermatology. 2012;225(1):45-53. doi: 10.1159/000339865. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
22922888
20.

Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database.

Dakin H.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Sep 5;11:151. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-151. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk