Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 18

1.

Cancer screening practices among physicians in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program.

Benard VB, Saraiya MS, Soman A, Roland KB, Yabroff KR, Miller J.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Oct;20(10):1479-84. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2530. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

2.

Preventing cervical cancer : overviews of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and 2 US immunization programs.

Khan K, Curtis CR, Ekwueme DU, Stokley S, Walker C, Roland K, Benard V, Saraiya M.

Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10 Suppl):3004-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23765. Review.

3.

Organizational change: a way to increase colon, breast and cervical cancer screening in primary care practices.

Arroyave AM, Penaranda EK, Lewis CL.

J Community Health. 2011 Apr;36(2):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9309-7. Review.

PMID:
20835777
4.

A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Escoffery C, Rodgers KC, Kegler MC, Haardörfer R, Howard DH, Liang S, Pinsker E, Roland KB, Allen JD, Ory MG, Bastani R, Fernandez ME, Risendal BC, Byrd TL, Coronado GD.

BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 24;14:274. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-274. Review.

5.

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effectiveness of breast and cervical cancer screening interventions for ethnic minority women.

Chan DN, So WK.

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Oct;19(5):536-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Review.

PMID:
25840817
6.

Influence of qualitative research on women's health screening guidelines.

Abadir AM, Lang A, Klein T, Abenhaim HA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):44.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Review.

PMID:
24055587
7.

Cultural Factors Associated with Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Korean American Women in the US: An Integrative Literature Review.

Lee SY.

Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2015 Jun;9(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 27. Review.

8.

Cancer screening in women with intellectual disabilities: an Irish perspective.

Reidy M, Denieffe S, Foran S.

J Intellect Disabil. 2014 Mar;18(1):51-60. doi: 10.1177/1744629514521067. Review.

PMID:
24591427
9.

Cervical cancer screening: what's new and what's coming?

Jin XW, Lipold L, McKenzie M, Sikon A.

Cleve Clin J Med. 2013 Mar;80(3):153-60. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.80a.12092. Review.

10.

Arab women's breast cancer screening practices: a literature review.

Donnelly TT, Khater AH, Al-Bader SB, Al Kuwari MG, Al-Meer N, Malik M, Singh R, Jong FC.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(8):4519-28. Review.

11.

Advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants and cancer prevention and screening: a systematic review.

Smith AA, Kepka D, Yabroff KR.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 12;14:68. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-68. Review.

12.

Screening for Cervical, Prostate, and Breast Cancer: Interpreting the Evidence.

Carter SM, Williams J, Parker L, Pickles K, Jacklyn G, Rychetnik L, Barratt A.

Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):274-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Review.

PMID:
26091929
13.

Common curbsides and conundrums in geriatric medicine.

Tung EE, Chen CY, Takahashi PY.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jun;88(6):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.03.017. Review.

PMID:
23726402
14.

Communicating the benefits and harms of cancer screening.

Forbes LJ, Ramirez AJ.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 May;16(5):382. doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0382-4. Review.

PMID:
24595678
15.

An overview of research in cancer diagnosis.

Berlin NI.

Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 May;50(5):249-54. Review.

PMID:
1092925
16.

Developing the Evidence Base to Inform Best Practice: A Scoping Study of Breast and Cervical Cancer Reviews in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Demment MM, Peters K, Dykens JA, Dozier A, Nawaz H, McIntosh S, Smith JS, Sy A, Irwin T, Fogg TT, Khaliq M, Blumenfeld R, Massoudi M, De Ver Dye T.

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0134618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134618. eCollection 2015. Review.

17.

Integrative review of the nursing interventions used for the early detection of cervical uterine cancer.

Vasconcelos CT, Damasceno MM, Lima FE, Pinheiro AK.

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Mar-Apr;19(2):437-44. Review. English, Portuguese, Spanish.

18.

Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research.

Andejeski Y, Breslau ES, Hart E, Lythcott N, Alexander L, Rich I, Bisceglio I, Smith HS, Visco FM; U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fiscal Year 1995 Breast Cancer Research Program Integration Panel.

J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Mar;11(2):119-36. Review.

PMID:
11975860
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk