Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 9

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 21364099)

1.

A study assessing the potential of negative effects in interdisciplinary math-biology instruction.

Madlung A, Bremer M, Himelblau E, Tullis A.

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Spring;10(1):43-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0102.

2.

Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: introduction to the special series.

Rivera DP.

J Learn Disabil. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):2-19, 68. Review.

PMID:
9009879
3.
4.

Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them.

Wood WB.

Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:93-112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175306. Review.

PMID:
19575638
5.

Bridging different perspectives of the physiological and mathematical disciplines.

Batzel JJ, Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Kappel F, Schneditz D, Kenner T, Goswami N.

Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Dec;36(4):265-74. doi: 10.1152/advan.00074.2012. Review.

6.

Student learning: what has instruction got to do with it?

Lee HS, Anderson JR.

Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:445-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143833. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Review.

PMID:
22804771
7.

Preparing high school students for the interdisciplinary nature of modern biology.

Nagle B.

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Jun 1;12(2):144-7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-03-0047. Review. No abstract available.

8.

Back to the future: education for systems-level biologists.

Wingreen N, Botstein D.

Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;7(11):829-32. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Review.

9.

The vision is set, now help chronicle the change.

Woodin T, Feser J, Herrera J.

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):347-50. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0162. Review. No abstract available.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk