Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 6

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 21226570)

1.

Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ.

N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):524-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011893. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

2.

Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genomic profiling to assess cardiovascular risk to improve cardiovascular health.

Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group.

Genet Med. 2010 Dec;12(12):839-43. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f872c0.

PMID:
21042222
3.

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.

Heshka JT, Palleschi C, Howley H, Wilson B, Wells PS.

Genet Med. 2008 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f. Review.

PMID:
18197053
4.

Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.

Bellcross CA, Page PZ, Meaney-Delman D.

Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38. Review.

PMID:
22846729
5.

Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

Marteau TM, French DP, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, Sutton S, Watkinson C, Attwood S, Hollands GJ.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;(10):CD007275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007275.pub2. Review.

PMID:
20927756
6.

Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.

EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Review.

PMID:
18328408
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk