Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 21

1.

Encouraging healthy beverage intake in child care and school settings.

Patel AI, Cabana MD.

Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Dec;22(6):779-84. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833f2fe2. Review.

PMID:
20814303
2.

School-based research and initiatives: fruit and vegetable environment, policy, and pricing workshop.

French SA, Wechsler H.

Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39 Suppl 2:S101-7. Review.

PMID:
15313079
3.

Competitive food initiatives in schools and overweight in children: a review of the evidence.

Fox S, Meinen A, Pesik M, Landis M, Remington PL.

WMJ. 2005 Jul;104(5):38-43. Review.

4.

Snacks, sweetened beverages, added sugars, and schools.

Council on School Health; Committee on Nutrition.

Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):575-83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3902. Review.

5.

Influence of school competitive food and beverage policies on obesity, consumption, and availability: a systematic review.

Chriqui JF, Pickel M, Story M.

JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Mar;168(3):279-86. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4457. Review.

PMID:
24473632
6.

Nutritional policies and standards for snacks served in after-school programmes: a review.

Beets MW, Tilley F, Kim Y, Webster C.

Public Health Nutr. 2011 Oct;14(10):1882-90. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001145. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
21729480
7.

Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity?

Jaime PC, Lock K.

Prev Med. 2009 Jan;48(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.018. Epub 2008 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
19026676
8.

The interplay of public health law and industry self-regulation: the case of sugar-sweetened beverage sales in schools.

Mello MM, Pomeranz J, Moran P.

Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):595-604. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Review.

9.

Survey of antiobesity legislation: are these laws working?

Downey M, Still C.

Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012 Oct;19(5):375-80. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328357a71f. Review.

PMID:
22895357
10.

A review of the literature on policies directed at the youth consumption of sugar sweetened beverages.

Levy DT, Friend KB, Wang YC.

Adv Nutr. 2011 Mar;2(2):182S-200S. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000356. Epub 2011 Mar 10. Review.

11.

When science met the consumer: the role of industry.

Short D.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1 Suppl):256S-258S. Review.

12.

Calcium intake trends and health consequences from childhood through adulthood.

Nicklas TA.

J Am Coll Nutr. 2003 Oct;22(5):340-56. Review.

PMID:
14559926
13.

Advanced policy options to regulate sugar-sweetened beverages to support public health.

Pomeranz JL.

J Public Health Policy. 2012 Feb;33(1):75-88. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2011.46. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
21866177
14.

Limiting the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico's obesogenic environment: a qualitative policy review and stakeholder analysis.

Moise N, Cifuentes E, Orozco E, Willett W.

J Public Health Policy. 2011 Nov;32(4):458-75. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2011.39. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Review.

PMID:
21654826
15.

Self-regulation and the response to concerns about food and beverage marketing to children in the United States.

Wilde P.

Nutr Rev. 2009 Mar;67(3):155-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00183.x. Review.

PMID:
19239630
16.

What role can child-care settings play in obesity prevention? A review of the evidence and call for research efforts.

Larson N, Ward DS, Neelon SB, Story M.

J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Sep;111(9):1343-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.007. Review.

PMID:
21872698
17.

Food, fizzy, and football: promoting unhealthy food and beverages through sport - a New Zealand case study.

Carter MA, Signal L, Edwards R, Hoek J, Maher A.

BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 11;13:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-126. Review.

18.

Availability and marketing of food and beverages to children through sports settings: a systematic review.

Carter MA, Edwards R, Signal L, Hoek J.

Public Health Nutr. 2012 Aug;15(8):1373-9. doi: 10.1017/S136898001100320X. Epub 2011 Nov 29. Review.

PMID:
22123225
19.

Mexico attempts to tackle obesity: the process, results, push backs and future challenges.

Barquera S, Campos I, Rivera JA.

Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14 Suppl 2:69-78. doi: 10.1111/obr.12096. Review.

PMID:
24103026
20.

Healthy incentive scheme in the Irish full-day-care pre-school setting.

Johnston Molloy C, Kearney J, Hayes N, Slattery CG, Corish C.

Proc Nutr Soc. 2014 Feb;73(1):147-58. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113003807. Epub 2013 Dec 16. Review.

PMID:
24330783
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk