Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks.

Minca EC, Kowalski D.

Mol Cell. 2010 Jun 11;38(5):649-61. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.020.

2.
3.

Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.

Unk I, Hajdú I, Blastyák A, Haracska L.

DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Mar 2;9(3):257-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Jan 21. Review.

PMID:
20096653
4.

Error-free DNA-damage tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Xu X, Blackwell S, Lin A, Li F, Qin Z, Xiao W.

Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;764:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 16. Review.

PMID:
26041265
5.

The DNA damage response during DNA replication.

Branzei D, Foiani M.

Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005 Dec;17(6):568-75. Epub 2005 Oct 13. Review.

PMID:
16226452
6.

Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart.

Petermann E, Helleday T.

Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Oct;11(10):683-7. doi: 10.1038/nrm2974. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Review.

PMID:
20842177
8.

DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.

Andreassen PR, Ho GP, D'Andrea AD.

Carcinogenesis. 2006 May;27(5):883-92. Epub 2006 Feb 20. Review.

9.

Resolving branched DNA intermediates with structure-specific nucleases during replication in eukaryotes.

Rass U.

Chromosoma. 2013 Dec;122(6):499-515. doi: 10.1007/s00412-013-0431-z. Epub 2013 Sep 6. Review.

10.

Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase.

Briggs GS, Mahdi AA, Weller GR, Wen Q, Lloyd RG.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 29;359(1441):49-59. Review.

11.

Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.

Atkinson J, McGlynn P.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(11):3475-92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp244. Epub 2009 Apr 30. Review.

12.

Multifaceted role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 helicase in homologous recombination regulation.

Macris MA, Sung P.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2005 Dec;33(Pt 6):1447-50. Review.

PMID:
16246143
13.

[DNA damage tolerance through replication bypass of stalled replication forks].

Hishida T.

Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 2009 Mar;54(4 Suppl):388-93. Review. Japanese. No abstract available.

PMID:
21089480
14.

Homologous recombination in Archaea: new Holliday junction helicases.

Bolt EL, Guy CP.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2003 Jun;31(Pt 3):703-5. Review.

PMID:
12773187
15.
16.

Coordination of DNA replication and recombination activities in the maintenance of genome stability.

Maher RL, Branagan AM, Morrical SW.

J Cell Biochem. 2011 Oct;112(10):2672-82. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23211. Review.

17.

Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.

Jones RM, Petermann E.

Biochem J. 2012 Apr 1;443(1):13-26. doi: 10.1042/BJ20112100. Review.

PMID:
22417748
18.

Homologous recombination in the archaea: the means justify the ends.

White MF.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2011 Jan;39(1):15-9. doi: 10.1042/BST0390015. Review.

PMID:
21265740
19.

DNA helicases required for homologous recombination and repair of damaged replication forks.

Wu L, Hickson ID.

Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:279-306. Review.

PMID:
16856806
20.

Accessory replicative helicases and the replication of protein-bound DNA.

Brüning JG, Howard JL, McGlynn P.

J Mol Biol. 2014 Dec 12;426(24):3917-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 13. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk