Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 26

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 20497626)

1.

How to do a meta-analysis.

Field AP, Gillett R.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Nov;63(Pt 3):665-94. doi: 10.1348/000711010X502733. Epub 2010 May 21.

PMID:
20497626
2.

Basic concepts in meta-analysis: A primer for clinicians.

Khoshdel A, Attia J, Carney SL.

Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;60(10):1287-94. Review.

PMID:
16981972
3.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
4.

The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.

Sinharay S, Stern HS, Russell D.

Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):317-29. Review.

PMID:
11778675
5.

Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.

Muncer S, Taylor S, Craigie M.

J Adv Nurs. 2002 May;38(3):274-80. Review.

PMID:
11972663
6.

Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.

Olkin I.

Stat Med. 1996 Jun 30;15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. Review.

PMID:
8817799
7.

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):421-45. Review.

PMID:
11191259
8.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

9.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.

10.

Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?

Anello C, Fleiss JL.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. Review.

PMID:
7853037
11.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
12.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.

Engberg S.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):258-65. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000319122.76112.23. Review.

PMID:
18496080
13.

Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications.

Lean IJ, Rabiee AR, Duffield TF, Dohoo IR.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3545-65. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2140. Review.

PMID:
19620636
14.

Meta-analysis: an introduction into a research process.

Livingston M, Messura J, Dellinger T, Holder R, Hyde J.

Spec Care Dentist. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):125-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2008.00033.x. Review.

PMID:
18647371
15.

Meta-analysis.

Delahaye F, Landrivon G, Ecochard R, Colin C.

Health Policy. 1991;19(2-3):185-96. Review.

PMID:
10115991
16.

Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: a presentation of methods and review of current practice.

Fairchild AJ, McQuillin SD.

J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):53-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.001. Epub . Review.

PMID:
20006988
17.
18.

Meta-analysis: A brief introduction.

Andrel JA, Keith SW, Leiby BE.

Clin Transl Sci. 2009 Oct;2(5):374-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00152.x. Review.

PMID:
20443922
19.

Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.

Huf W, Kalcher K, Pail G, Friedrich ME, Filzmoser P, Kasper S.

World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;12(3):188-200. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.551544. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Review.

PMID:
21375365
20.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk