Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 41

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 20124233)

1.

Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):167-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008. Review.

PMID:
20124233
2.

A systematic review and economic evaluation of new-generation computed tomography scanners for imaging in coronary artery disease and congenital heart disease: Somatom Definition Flash, Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT and Discovery CT750 HD.

Westwood M, Al M, Burgers L, Redekop K, Lhachimi S, Armstrong N, Raatz H, Misso K, Severens J, Kleijnen J.

Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(9):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17090. Review.

3.
4.

A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence.

Pennant M, Takwoingi Y, Pennant L, Davenport C, Fry-Smith A, Eisinga A, Andronis L, Arvanitis T, Deeks J, Hyde C.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(50):1-103. doi: 10.3310/hta14500. Review.

5.

Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients.

Wang LW, Fahim MA, Hayen A, Mitchell RL, Baines L, Lord S, Craig JC, Webster AC.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD008691. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008691.pub2. Review.

PMID:
22161434
6.

Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling.

Meads C, Auguste P, Davenport C, Małysiak S, Sundar S, Kowalska M, Zapalska A, Guest P, Thangaratinam S, Martin-Hirsch P, Borowiack E, Barton P, Roberts T, Khan K.

Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(12):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta17120. Review.

7.

Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography.

Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, Wijns W.

Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):404-11. Review.

PMID:
16442907
8.

Computed tomography for detecting coronary artery plaques: a meta-analysis.

Gao D, Ning N, Guo Y, Ning W, Niu X, Yang J.

Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Review.

PMID:
21920524
9.

Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Sun Z, Jiang W.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Nov;60(2):279-86. Epub 2006 Aug 2. Review.

PMID:
16887313
10.

Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis.

Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M, Hamon M.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 7;48(9):1896-910. Epub 2006 Sep 26. Review.

11.

Evaluating PET-CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation.

Meads C, Davenport C, Małysiak S, Kowalska M, Zapalska A, Guest P, Martin-Hirsch P, Borowiack E, Auguste P, Barton P, Roberts T, Khan K, Sundar S.

BJOG. 2014 Mar;121(4):398-407. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12488. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Review.

PMID:
24299154
12.

Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Cooper KL, Meng Y, Harnan S, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, Wyld L, Ingram C, Wilkinson ID, Lorenz E.

Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta15040. Review.

13.
14.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for advanced retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Jong MC, de Graaf P, Noij DP, Göricke S, Maeder P, Galluzzi P, Brisse HJ, Moll AC, Castelijns JA; European Retinoblastoma Imaging Collaboration (ERIC).

Ophthalmology. 2014 May;121(5):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.021. Epub 2014 Mar 1. Review.

PMID:
24589388
15.

New imaging techniques for diagnosing coronary artery disease.

Escolar E, Weigold G, Fuisz A, Weissman NJ.

CMAJ. 2006 Feb 14;174(4):487-95. Review.

16.

Diagnostic accuracy of first generation dual-source computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis from 24 studies.

Guo SL, Guo YM, Zhai YN, Ma B, Wang P, Yang KH.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;27(6):755-71. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9690-4. Epub 2010 Sep 21. Review.

PMID:
20857200
17.

Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Jong MC, Genders TS, van Geuns RJ, Moelker A, Hunink MG.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1881-95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1. Epub 2012 Apr 19. Review.

18.

[Primary diagnosis of coronary artery disease by MRI and CT].

Sandstede J, Beer M, Pabst T, Köstler H, Hahn D.

Rofo. 2003 Apr;175(4):477-83. Review. German.

PMID:
12677501
19.

Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Fieno DS, Germano G, Slomka P, Wong ND, Kang X, Rozanski A.

J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):74-82. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk