Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 54

1.

Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench.

Macleod MR, Fisher M, O'Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PM, Buchan A, van der Worp HB, Traystman RJ, Minematsu K, Donnan GA, Howells DW.

Int J Stroke. 2009 Feb;4(1):3-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00241.x.

PMID:
19236488
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench.

Macleod MR, Fisher M, O'Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PM, Buchan A, van der Worp HB, Traystman RJ, Minematsu K, Donnan GA, Howells DW.

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Feb;29(2):221-3. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.101. Epub 2008 Sep 17. Review. Erratum in: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Jun;29(6):1226. Buchan, Alistair [corrected to Buchan, Alastair].

PMID:
18797473
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research.

Dirnagl U.

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 Dec;26(12):1465-78. Epub 2006 Mar 8. Review.

PMID:
16525413
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Why do neuroprotective drugs work in animals but not humans?

DeGraba TJ, Pettigrew LC.

Neurol Clin. 2000 May;18(2):475-93. Review.

PMID:
10757837
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.
6.

Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.

Bender R, Bunce C, Clarke M, Gates S, Lange S, Pace NL, Thorlund K.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;61(9):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.004. Review.

PMID:
18687287
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Bias in surgical research.

Paradis C.

Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf4b. Review.

PMID:
18650626
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of piracetam and piracetam-like compounds in experimental stroke.

Wheble PC, Sena ES, Macleod MR.

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(1-2):5-11. Epub 2007 Nov 22. Review.

PMID:
18033952
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of tirilazad in experimental stroke.

Sena E, Wheble P, Sandercock P, Macleod M.

Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2):388-94. Epub 2007 Jan 4. Review.

PMID:
17204689
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Challenges and standards in reporting diagnostic and prognostic biomarker studies.

Azuaje F, Devaux Y, Wagner D.

Clin Transl Sci. 2009 Apr;2(2):156-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00075.x. Review.

PMID:
20443882
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Animal models of stroke: do they have value for discovering neuroprotective agents?

Richard Green A, Odergren T, Ashwood T.

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2003 Aug;24(8):402-8. Review.

PMID:
12915049
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Bias: a review of current understanding.

Adebiyi AO.

Afr J Med Med Sci. 2010 Sep;39(3):241-8. Review.

PMID:
21416795
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke?

Sena E, van der Worp HB, Howells D, Macleod M.

Trends Neurosci. 2007 Sep;30(9):433-9. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Review.

PMID:
17765332
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Selection bias and information bias in clinical research.

Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C.

Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(2):c94-9. doi: 10.1159/000312871. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Review.

PMID:
20407272
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.

Chalmers I, Glasziou P.

Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
19525005
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Dose-related neuroprotective versus neurodamaging effects of estrogens in rat cerebral ischemia: a systematic analysis.

Strom JO, Theodorsson A, Theodorsson E.

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Aug;29(8):1359-72. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.66. Epub 2009 May 20. Review.

PMID:
19458604
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Reporting P values.

Savik K.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;33(3):247-51. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16717513
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Techniques for examining neuroprotective drugs in vivo.

Green AR, Cross AJ.

Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;40:47-68. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8989616
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Is progesterone a candidate neuroprotective factor for treatment following ischemic stroke?

Gibson CL, Coomber B, Rathbone J.

Neuroscientist. 2009 Aug;15(4):324-32. doi: 10.1177/1073858409333069. Epub 2009 Apr 9. Review.

PMID:
19359672
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Are animal models as good as we think?

Wall RJ, Shani M.

Theriogenology. 2008 Jan 1;69(1):2-9. Epub 2007 Nov 7. Review.

PMID:
17988725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk