Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.

Yoshii A, Plaut DA, McGraw KA, Anderson MJ, Wellik KE.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):21-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.004.

PMID:
19158999
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Review.

PMID:
19230612
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.

Sood A, Sood R, Bauer BA, Ebbert JO.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):719-22. Review.

PMID:
16131298
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.

Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
19282144
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.

Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB.

Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Review.

PMID:
19712212
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. Review.

PMID:
16092960
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

[The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic literature reviews about the efficiency of a treatment].

Aertgeerts B, Cools F.

Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2007;69(5-6):335-50. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
18351212
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A review of methodological quality of systematic reviews on multiple pregnancies.

Jayaram PM, Khan KS.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Nov;26(8):731-5. Review.

PMID:
17130017
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1095-1104. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
17938050
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Can Cochrane Reviews in controversial areas be biased? A sensitivity analysis based on the protocol of a Systematic Cochrane Review on low-level laser therapy in osteoarthritis.

Bjordal JM, Bogen B, Lopes-Martins RA, Klovning A.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Oct;23(5):453-8. Review.

PMID:
16262573
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.

Engberg S.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):258-65. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000319122.76112.23. Review.

PMID:
18496080
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.

Roundtree AK, Kallen MA, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kimmel B, Skidmore B, Ortiz Z, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013763
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

[The practice of systematic reviews. XI. The Cochrane Library].

Boluyt N, Scholten RJ, Offringa M.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Dec 27;147(52):2572-7. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
14723024
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A systematic review of physical and rehabilitation medicine topics as developed by the Cochrane Collaboration.

Negrini S, Minozzi S, Taricco M, Ziliani V, Zaina F.

Eura Medicophys. 2007 Sep;43(3):381-90. Review.

PMID:
17921964
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
16.

Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses.

Barker FG 2nd, Carter BS.

Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Oct 15;19(4):E5. Review.

PMID:
16241107
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.

Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. Review.

PMID:
16488353
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
18394536
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.

Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(1):1-76. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
12583822
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
20.

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.

Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk