Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

1.

Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions.

Leeflang MM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Zwinderman AH.

Clin Chem. 2008 Apr;54(4):729-37. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096032. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

3.

Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.

Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. Review.

PMID:
7853038
4.

Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests.

Greiner M, Gardner IA.

Prev Vet Med. 2000 May 30;45(1-2):3-22. Review.

PMID:
10802331
5.

Effects of bias on the results of diagnostic studies of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Boyer K, Wies J, Turkelson CM.

J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.018. Epub 2009 May 15. Review.

PMID:
19446966
6.
7.

Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases.

Christensen J, Gardner IA.

Prev Vet Med. 2000 May 30;45(1-2):83-106. Review.

PMID:
10802335
8.
9.
10.

Frequentist and Bayesian approaches to prevalence estimation using examples from Johne's disease.

McV Messam LL, Branscum AJ, Collins MT, Gardner IA.

Anim Health Res Rev. 2008 Jun;9(1):1-23. doi: 10.1017/S1466252307001314. Epub 2008 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
18346298
11.

Sources of heterogeneities in estimating the prevalence of endometriosis in infertile and previously fertile women.

Guo SW, Wang Y.

Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1584-95. Epub 2006 Oct 24. Review.

PMID:
17067588
12.

The influence of analytical bias on diagnostic misclassifications.

Petersen PH, de Verdier CH, Groth T, Fraser CG, Blaabjerg O, Hørder M.

Clin Chim Acta. 1997 Apr 25;260(2):189-206. Review.

PMID:
9177913
13.

A review of theoretical and practical aspects of clinical laboratory testing.

Nowakowski R.

Optom Clin. 1992;2(1):1-14. Review.

PMID:
1576438
14.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies.

Freeman K, Szczepura A, Osipenko L.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Dec 9. Review.

PMID:
19081172
15.

Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey.

Bachmann LM, Puhan MA, ter Riet G, Bossuyt PM.

BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1127-9. Epub 2006 Apr 20. Review.

16.

Practical sample size calculations for surveillance and diagnostic investigations.

Fosgate GT.

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009 Jan;21(1):3-14. Review.

17.

Parasite prevalence and sample size: misconceptions and solutions.

Jovani R, Tella JL.

Trends Parasitol. 2006 May;22(5):214-8. Epub 2006 Mar 13. Review.

PMID:
16531119
18.

Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.

Peters JL, Mengersen KL.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):941-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01010.x. Review.

PMID:
19018929
19.

Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.

Leeflang MM, Bossuyt PM, Irwig L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7. Review.

PMID:
18778913
20.

Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.

EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Review.

PMID:
18328408
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk