Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 7

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 17971596)

1.

Projecting individualized probabilities of developing bladder cancer in white individuals.

Wu X, Lin J, Grossman HB, Huang M, Gu J, Etzel CJ, Amos CI, Dinney CP, Spitz MR.

J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;25(31):4974-81.

2.

Overview of risk prediction models in cardiovascular disease research.

Cui J.

Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;19(10):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 22. Review.

PMID:
19628409
3.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Garside R, Pitt M, Anderson R, Rogers G, Dyer M, Mealing S, Somerville M, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. Review.

4.

The comparability of models for predicting the risk of a positive prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen alone: a systematic review.

Schröder F, Kattan MW.

Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):274-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 May 22. Review.

PMID:
18511177
5.

Applicability and relevance of models that predict short term outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage.

Ariesen MJ, Algra A, van der Worp HB, Rinkel GJ.

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):839-44. Review.

6.

Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.

Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt KR, Pankratz VS.

Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):217. doi: 10.1186/bcr1829. Review.

7.

Risk prediction models of breast cancer: a systematic review of model performances.

Anothaisintawee T, Teerawattananon Y, Wiratkapun C, Kasamesup V, Thakkinstian A.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1853-z. Epub 2011 Nov 11. Review.

PMID:
22076477
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk