Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 36

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 17925316)

1.

Evaluation of networks of randomized trials.

Salanti G, Higgins JP, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Jun;17(3):279-301. Epub 2007 Oct 9. Review.

PMID:
17925316
2.

A Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis of treatments for alcohol dependence and implications for planning future trials.

DeSantis SM, Zhu H.

Med Decis Making. 2014 Oct;34(7):899-910. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14537558. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Review.

PMID:
24935915
3.

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.

Edwards SJ, Clarke MJ, Wordsworth S, Borrill J.

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;63(6):841-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x. Review.

PMID:
19490195
4.

Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.

King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. Review.

5.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
6.

Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.

Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C.

PLoS One. 2010 Nov 10;5(11):e11054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054. Review.

7.
8.

Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.

Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, Sheikh A.

J R Soc Med. 2006 Sep;99(9):470-2. Review.

9.

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.

Clarke MJ, Stewart LA.

J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):119-26. Review.

PMID:
9238566
10.

Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.

Hammad TA, Neyarapally GA, Pinheiro SP, Iyasu S, Rochester G, Dal Pan G.

Clin Trials. 2013;10(3):389-97. doi: 10.1177/1740774513479467. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Review.

PMID:
23508987
11.

Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.

Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM.

Br J Surg. 2010 Apr;97(4):466-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6988. Review.

PMID:
20155790
12.
13.

A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.

Fisher DJ, Copas AJ, Tierney JF, Parmar MK.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):949-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.016. Epub 2011 Mar 16. Review.

PMID:
21411280
14.

Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review.

Linde K, Melchart D.

J Altern Complement Med. 1998 Winter;4(4):371-88. Review.

PMID:
9884175
15.

Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment.

Sutton A, Ades AE, Cooper N, Abrams K.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):753-67. Review.

PMID:
18767896
16.

Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons.

Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, Stam W.

Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):956-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x. Epub 2008 May 16. Review.

PMID:
18489499
17.

Systematic review on the efficacy of fexofenadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Compalati E, Baena-Cagnani R, Penagos M, Badellino H, Braido F, Gómez RM, Canonica GW, Baena-Cagnani CE.

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156(1):1-15. Review.

PMID:
21969990
18.

Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations.

Hammad TA, Pinheiro SP, Neyarapally GA.

Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):559-70. doi: 10.1177/1740774511419165. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Review.

PMID:
21878445
19.

Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities.

Singh S, Loke YK.

Trials. 2012 Aug 20;13:138. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-138. Review.

20.

Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.

Laopaiboon M.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2003 Dec;12(6):515-30. Review.

PMID:
14653354
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk