Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 58

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 17404342)

1.
2.

Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.

Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, Sheikh A.

J R Soc Med. 2006 Sep;99(9):470-2. Review.

3.

Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.

Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, Roberts NW, Straus SE.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;9:CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2. Review.

PMID:
22972142
4.

Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.

Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1214-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06166yel. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
21294992
5.

Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis.

Catalá-López F, Alonso-Arroyo A, Hutton B, Aleixandre-Benavent R, Moher D.

BMC Med. 2014 Jan 29;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-15. Review.

6.

Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.

Milette K, Roseman M, Thombs BD.

J Psychosom Res. 2011 Mar;70(3):205-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Review.

PMID:
21334491
7.

Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.

King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. Review.

8.

The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.

Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. Review.

9.
10.

Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials.

Sun X, Briel M, Busse JW, Akl EA, You JJ, Mejza F, Bala M, Diaz-Granados N, Bassler D, Mertz D, Srinathan SK, Vandvik PO, Malaga G, Alshurafa M, Dahm P, Alonso-Coello P, Heels-Ansdell DM, Bhatnagar N, Johnston BC, Wang L, Walter SD, Altman DG, Guyatt GH.

Trials. 2009 Nov 9;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-101. Review.

11.

Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.

Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000001. Review.

PMID:
17443625
12.
13.

Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.

Kiehna EN, Starke RM, Pouratian N, Dumont AS.

J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):280-5. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS091770. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
21054137
14.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
15.

Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.

Burton M, Clarke M.

Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):101-14, ix. Review.

PMID:
16442423
16.

Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.

Afshari A.

Dan Med Bull. 2011 Sep;58(9):B4316. Review.

PMID:
21893014
18.

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.

Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D, Bond GR, Huxley P, Tyrer P.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. Review.

19.

Implications of socio-cultural contexts for the ethics of clinical trials.

Ashcroft RE, Chadwick DW, Clark SR, Edwards RH, Frith L, Hutton JL.

Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(9):i-iv, 1-65. Review.

20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk