Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 16

1.

The SUMO protease SENP5 is required to maintain mitochondrial morphology and function.

Zunino R, Schauss A, Rippstein P, Andrade-Navarro M, McBride HM.

J Cell Sci. 2007 Apr 1;120(Pt 7):1178-88. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

2.

Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial fission through modification of the dynamin-related protein Drp1.

Chang CR, Blackstone C.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jul;1201:34-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05629.x. Review.

PMID:
20649536
3.

Dynamics of mitochondrial morphology in healthy cells and during apoptosis.

Karbowski M, Youle RJ.

Cell Death Differ. 2003 Aug;10(8):870-80. Review.

4.

Shaping mitochondria: The complex posttranslational regulation of the mitochondrial fission protein DRP1.

Santel A, Frank S.

IUBMB Life. 2008 Jul;60(7):448-55. doi: 10.1002/iub.71. Review.

5.

Enhanced detection of in vivo SUMO conjugation by Ubc9 fusion-dependent sumoylation (UFDS).

Niedenthal R.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;497:63-79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-566-4_5. Review.

PMID:
19107411
6.

SUMO-specific proteases and the cell cycle. An essential role for SENP5 in cell proliferation.

Di Bacco A, Gill G.

Cell Cycle. 2006 Oct;5(20):2310-3. Epub 2006 Oct 16. Review.

PMID:
17102611
7.

Mitochondrial reticulum network dynamics in relation to oxidative stress, redox regulation, and hypoxia.

Jezek P, Plecitá-Hlavatá L.

Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009 Oct;41(10):1790-804. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 Mar 3. Review. Erratum in: Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010 May;42(5):771.

PMID:
19703650
8.

FRET-based in vitro assays for the analysis of SUMO protease activities.

Tatham MH, Hay RT.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;497:253-68. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-566-4_17. Review.

PMID:
19107423
9.

Physiological and pathological significance of dynamin-related protein 1 (drp1)-dependent mitochondrial fission in the nervous system.

Cho B, Choi SY, Cho HM, Kim HJ, Sun W.

Exp Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;22(3):149-57. doi: 10.5607/en.2013.22.3.149. Epub 2013 Sep 30. Review.

11.

Staying in aerobic shape: how the structural integrity of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA is maintained.

Scott SV, Cassidy-Stone A, Meeusen SL, Nunnari J.

Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003 Aug;15(4):482-8. Review.

PMID:
12892790
12.

Mitochondrial morphology transitions and functions: implications for retrograde signaling?

Picard M, Shirihai OS, Gentil BJ, Burelle Y.

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013 Mar 15;304(6):R393-406. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00584.2012. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Review.

13.

Mitochondrial morphology and distribution in mammalian cells.

Frazier AE, Kiu C, Stojanovski D, Hoogenraad NJ, Ryan MT.

Biol Chem. 2006 Dec;387(12):1551-8. Review.

PMID:
17132100
14.

Shared components of mitochondrial and peroxisomal division.

Schrader M.

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun;1763(5-6):531-41. Epub 2006 Feb 2. Review.

15.

How to analyze mitochondrial morphology in healthy cells and apoptotic cells in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Rolland SG.

Methods Enzymol. 2014;544:75-98. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-417158-9.00004-2. Review.

PMID:
24974287
16.

The SUMO arena goes mitochondrial with MAPL.

Scorrano L, Liu D.

EMBO Rep. 2009 Jul;10(7):694-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.141. Epub 2009 Jun 12. Review. No abstract available.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk