Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 20

1.
3.

Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature.

Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R.

Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):541-52. Review.

PMID:
12194625
4.

[Patients' beliefs about their illness and adaptation after myocardial infarction].

Włodarczyk D.

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2004 Jul;17(97):81-4. Review. Polish.

PMID:
15559620
5.

The psychological perspective: a professional view.

Newman S.

Heart. 2003 May;89 Suppl 2:ii16-8; discussion ii35-7. Review.

6.

Cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction.

Piotrowicz R, Wolszakiewicz J.

Cardiol J. 2008;15(5):481-7. Review.

7.
8.

A qualitative systematic review of influences on attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs after referral.

Clark AM, King-Shier KM, Thompson DR, Spaling MA, Duncan AS, Stone JA, Jaglal SB, Angus JE.

Am Heart J. 2012 Dec;164(6):835-45.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 29. Review.

PMID:
23194483
9.

Illness perceptions about asthma are determinants of outcome.

Kaptein AA, Hughes BM, Scharloo M, Fischer MJ, Snoei L, Weinman J, Rabe KF.

J Asthma. 2008 Aug;45(6):459-64. doi: 10.1080/02770900802040043. Review.

PMID:
18612897
10.

Improving uptake of cardiac rehabilitation: using theoretical modelling to design an intervention.

Mosleh SM, Kiger A, Campbell N.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Sep;8(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 19. Review.

PMID:
19303364
11.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, Tanajewski L, Turner D, Price A.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. Review.

12.

Whose illness is it anyway? Why patient perceptions matter.

Cooper AF.

Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Nov-Dec;52(8):551-6. Review.

PMID:
10622054
13.

Illness perceptions, mood and quality of life: a systematic review of coronary heart disease patients.

Foxwell R, Morley C, Frizelle D.

J Psychosom Res. 2013 Sep;75(3):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
23972409
14.
15.

Adjunctive manual thrombectomy improves myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

De Luca G, Dudek D, Sardella G, Marino P, Chevalier B, Zijlstra F.

Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):3002-10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn389. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Review.

16.

Prognostic impact of right ventricular involvement in patients with acute myocardial infarction: meta-analysis.

Hamon M, Agostini D, Le Page O, Riddell JW, Hamon M.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2023-33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817d213d. Review.

PMID:
18552681
17.

Beyond the walls: a review of ICU clinics and their impact on patient outcomes after leaving hospital.

Williams TA, Leslie GD.

Aust Crit Care. 2008 Feb;21(1):6-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.11.001. Review.

PMID:
18206381
18.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: how well does it work?

Oliver D, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Thabane L, Reizgys K, Foster G.

Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):621-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn203. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Review.

19.

Engaging patients in managing their cardiovascular health.

Newman S.

Heart. 2004 Jun;90 Suppl 4:iv9-13; discussion iv39-40. Review.

20.

[The methodological aspects of patient rehabilitation after a myocardial infarct and heart operations (a review of the literature)].

Kliuzhev VM, Iakovlev VN, Ognev AK, Man'kov IuU, Nechaev DF, Sliusar IB.

Voen Med Zh. 1994 Feb;(2):40-6. Review. Russian. No abstract available.

PMID:
8165794
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk